Jump to content

Order of the Arrow

Discussions for OA Members and those interested in Scouting's Honor Society. Also includes a private sub-forum for OA Members only.


Subforums

  1. Western Region

    Sections, Lodges and local discussions

    43
    posts
  2. NOAC

    Been to NOAC? Heading there? Chat about the Order's bi-annual gathering

    222
    posts
  3. Central Region

    Sections, Lodges and local discussions

    136
    posts
  4. Northeast Region

    Sections, Lodges and local discussions

    50
    posts
  5. Southern Region

    Sections, Lodges and local discussion

    154
    posts

582 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 28 replies
    • 9.2k views
    • 112 replies
    • 26.6k views
  1. can I post now?

    • 1 reply
    • 1.6k views
  2. Region Divisions

    • 1 reply
    • 1.8k views
    • 19 replies
    • 8k views
  3. OA Election Question 1 2 3 4 5

    • 69 replies
    • 16k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.7k views
    • 19 replies
    • 4.5k views
  4. Broken Arrow Ceremony

    • 8 replies
    • 3.5k views
  5. 2015 NOAC

    • 1 reply
    • 1.9k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.9k views
  6. Lodge numbers

    • 14 replies
    • 4k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.8k views
  7. Philmont Grace - Lënape

    • 1 reply
    • 4.6k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • There is a mechanism already in place... 1.  Scout tells parents they would like a new Scoutmaster, and articulates GOOD reasons for it.  Parents tell committee: committee evaluates and takes action, with advice and consent of COR. 2.  Scout tells Boards of Review they think they'd like a new Scoutmaster, and articulates GOOD reasons for it.  (BoR is made of Committee Members and parents.)  Committee evaluates and takes action, with advice and consent of COR. Although I understand the sentiment, youth must not make the decision of who should be Scoutmaster.  (Inmates running the asylum and all  )  To implement this would mean an abdication of responsibility by COR and Troop Committee. Unfortunately, reality is often that the Scoutmaster is simply the person with a pulse who said they'd do the job. In 45+ years of Scouting, I've never seen a unit with a decent succession plan.  Still looking for that unicorn. (Yes, I have failed to get this accomplished in many a unit.  If I was allowed to be the benevolent dictator, things would have been different.)    
    • I don't know that I would call it "woke".  Seems like democracy is a foundation of the country.  As qwazse said, they can vote with their feet.  That's probably a less desirable outcome than having a mechanism whereby the Scouts can decide they want a new adult leader.  
    • No, but nothing would surprise me in this new generation of "wokeness".  Adult leaders serve at the appointment and pleasure of the Chartered Organization. The Committee can recommend potential candidates.  The PLC can voice their opinions, I suppose.  But election?  Nope.
    • Your council is "supposed" to have an Enterprise Risk Management Committee that should review this... Good Luck, https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/healthsafety/pdf/680-026.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...