Jump to content

T2Eagle

Members
  • Content count

    858
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

T2Eagle last won the day on August 9

T2Eagle had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

348 Excellent

About T2Eagle

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Northwest Ohio

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Enable
  1. T2Eagle

    Difficult Parent Interraction

    I disagree a little bit on this. The fact is that for however much we may want scouts to work through us and be independent of their parents, their parents remain THE most important fact in their lives. If you have a conversation with this scout and not the parent you're just going to end up frustrating the scout, probably yourself, and the dad. You're going to put the scout in the middle of a disagreement between two adults; it shouldn't be that way but it is. Talk to the father face to face, explain your position, explain your reasoning, and then talk to the scout to be sure that he understands the expectations. You're not going to be able to avoid this conversation.
  2. T2Eagle

    Oct 1, 2018 - GSS ends Patrol Method?

    That's fascinating. Just to clarify, up until and including now, if a patrol of LDS scouts wanted to say go for a five mile hike, they would have had to have two adults with them? If so, then either we have to conclude that for a large part of the scouting movement the sky fell a long time ago, or we can conclude that maybe the sky isn't falling all that hard for the rest of scouting today. ETA, I don't particularly care for the new rule, but I think it matters a lot more what an adult does than whether an adult is there.
  3. T2Eagle

    Adult led and youth led

    I don't know that we're all in disagreement here, but I think it is worth clarifying what is meant by "adults have the over all responsibility for something such as an event." This is probably the biggest challenge I face as a concept with adult leadership in my unit. There are very few things where the adults have over all responsibility for an event; they are generally where the effect of having the event go poorly will fall not on the scouts but on folks outside of the troop. We adults always have some very specific responsibilities for an event: health and safety, and adherence to BSA and CO policies, but as long as no one is getting unnecessarily hurt, endangered, or misbehaving, neither the success nor the failure of an event is the adults' responsibility. Let's look at an example. On a campout, the PLC has as its goal that in the morning each patrol will set up a station of basic T21 skills like lashings, knife and axe safety, and fire building so that newer scouts get a chance to learn and all scouts get a chance to practice. Come that day the plan falls apart; some patrols don't have the supplies they need, the PLs aren't effectively leading, the scouts within the patrols aren't working as a team, and it just sort of breaks down. The adults can provide some coaching along the process, but they shouldn't step in and take over just to make sure that the program is a "success". It's OK if it's a complete failure, the adults' role at that point is to work to help the boys later analyze what went wrong and how they can perform better in the future. This is one of the hardest parts of being a scout leader --- watching the boys fail when you know how easy it would be to step in and make something a success. Adult leaders may get some criticism from other adults when they get back, "why didn't X happen, I thought the guys were going to accomplish Y" and the adult leaders have to be able to defend the program: "X and Y didn't happen because the scouts weren't able to make them happen, and they're going to learn from this, but it wasn't our job to step in and make sure X and Y happened."
  4. T2Eagle

    Adult led and youth led

    A bit off topic, but this was on its way to being one of my favorite sessions at Woodbadge, but it instead became a symbol of what I came to really dislike about Wb. Just as we were in the midst of a great discussion it was cut short because we had run behind on time and needed to move on to the next activity. What was so urgent that we had to cut the discussion short --- a make-believe PLC where the main topic of discussion was what percentage of uniform inspection we should adopt that day to constitute a passing score.
  5. If your CO is a Catholic Church dual background and YPT is just about universal.
  6. T2Eagle

    Have you done the new Youth Protection Training?

    My troop has been looking for some material on bullying to show to the scouts. For folks have taken the new training, do you think the bullying component would be appropriate for scouts or is it too much? Does anyone have any other anti-bullying material they would recommend.
  7. T2Eagle

    Gender Identity Issue

    My advice would be to talk to the scout first about talking to the parents, and if the scout gives you reason to think his parents reaction would be bad then I believe you're obligated to not tell the parents. The ugly truth is that not all parents are good, not all parents are nice, and sexual orientation and gender issues are forseeably an area that can trigger terrible behavior from a parent towards a child. Putting a child at risk that way would be morally wrong. If the scout can't talk to their parents then yes you need some higher level expert help. Getting the scout to talk to a counselor at school would probably be a good alternative to talking to their parents. If you're at the point where you have reason not to talk to the parents, then you definitely need to get some guidance from higher up, either your DE/SE or someone in your CO. Calling the school counselor yourself is also a possibility: "I have a scout, unnamed, who is one of your students has told me X, what can you the school counselor do, what do you a professional who also has a responsibility towards this child recommend that I do?" But the best and most likely course is that your scout can talk to their parents, and then you can talk to their parents and move on from there. Within the troop call the scout whatever they want to be called, it's not our job to decide what their name is.
  8. This policy is going to cause trouble in your troop, if not with your son than with some other scout. Scout pushing to make Life before 17.5 years old finishes last mb for the rank, needs the SM conference, but is scheduled to take SATs during next campout, misses deadline --- trouble ensues. Polite conversation with SM about why this is being done, explain it poses problem, try to get compromise.
  9. Very nice. The key I think is in the leading not just doing component of any project. You can build some benches and a walking trail in your local park by going out by yourself for a few days and doing the work, or you can do it by organizing and directing others to do the work alongside you. The same certainly applies to a building a web site: do all the work yourself or gather a group of people and lead them through the component steps to getting the website built.
  10. So this is the part I'm trying to understand, not criticize, just understand. As a Catholic, serving in a Catholic unit, Scouting is a youth ministry for our parish, but not THE youth ministry. In terms of faith development there are more important ministries for the proper formation of our youth, either direct Catholic education within a Catholic school, or Catholic education through the parish for those students who attend public schools. This is an inchoate description, but I'm really just trying to get at the point that scouting is a sort of secondary youth ministry and not, as I understand it is with the LDS today, the primary youth ministry. So, after 2019, youth in the LDS will have a new primary program. As the video above says and hopes, some LDS will continue in scouting and it will be for them much closer to the thing it is for my scouts. Under those circumstances, will there be a Church defined discouragement for girls to join the program? And as a secondary question, what is it about the Scouts BSA model as its supposed to be run: a single gender, outdoor based, character and citizenship development program, that would make it inappropriate for young women to participate in?
  11. I find it interesting that he speaks about a desire to have his grandsons become Eagle Scouts, but seems to preclude the possibility of his granddaughters following that trail. For the LDS members on the forum. When scouting is no longer the Church's youth program for young men and recedes to the same position in an LDS family that say a sports team, 4H, or similar extracurricular activity would occupy, would there be a church prohibition against a young female member of the LDS joining scouting? If so what would be the reasoning?
  12. T2Eagle

    REI weighs in

    I thought I'd know the answer, but I didn't want to guess so I asked Mrs. T2 (we'd had a somewhat related conversation recently). She said if someone opens the door for me because they got there first and are being courteous that's nice, when I get to a door first I hold it open for people. If someone thinks they need to hold a door for me because they're a man and I'm a woman, that's silly mostly, with enough condescension based on the history of the practice to annoy me if they make a point of it. Let ladies eat first, she said, " that's definitely condescending; the reason to do that would be a sense that women need to be protected by the men, or the women are weaker than the men and therefore couldn't stand the privation, or both, either way it's based on a sense of being superior/stronger because you're a man, and I have no patience for that **** any more."
  13. T2Eagle

    "Serve actively in your troop"

    I've been doing this stuff for a long time. I've been called a softy, but never soft.
  14. T2Eagle

    "Serve actively in your troop"

    I think we're within the guidelines set out in the GTA. "4.2.3.4.3 Meeting Unit Expectations. If a unit has established expectations for positions of responsibility, and if, within reason (see the note under “Rank Requirements Overview,” 4.2.3.0), based on his personal skill set, the Scout meets them, he fulfills the requirement." Here's the note referred to: "The concepts of “reasonable” and “within reason” will help unit leadership and boards of review gauge the fairness of expectations for considering whether a Scout is “active” or has fulfilled positions of responsibility. A unit is allowed, of course, to establish expectations acceptable to its chartered organization and unit committee. But for advancement purposes, Scouts must not be held to those which are so demanding as to be impractical for today’s youth (and families) to achieve. Ultimately, a board of review shall decide what is reasonable and what is not. In doing so, the board members must use common sense and must take into account that youth should be allowed to balance their lives with positive activities outside of Scouting." We're crystal clear up front, with both scouts and parents, that you have to make half, and we're not fanatic about it if there really are offsetting circumstances. When we first established this several years ago there was a fair amount of grumbling, among some adults, that 50% wasn't high enough. But I gathered some records and showed that 50% is rare. Most scouts either make it easily, or really easily aren't making it, and that's what we want --- that it's clear either way --- what we really want to avoid is having to make judgment calls and exceptions, and that's what we would end up doing if we set things higher. We've had a handful of scouts over the years that we had to tell them they didn't get credit and they were all OK with it. One scout, ASM's son, was really on the bubble and approaching 18; he was looking at having to skip something really fun but not really a requirement at school to make the number of campouts. His solution, "hey, if I can organize an additional campout this month and get a bunch of guys to go would that count? " Worked out just fine.
  15. T2Eagle

    "Serve actively in your troop"

    Way too few facts to answer as a hypothetical. If a scout counted the days, hit 120 and said "that's it, time card punched, job done" we'd be having a pretty serious conversation. On the other hand, the world turns: what looked like in mid August would be a great thing for everybody, might look very different in mid December as finals approach, other activities make their own demands, schedules change, etc.
×