Advancement Resources
Scouting ranks, merit bades, and the advancement programs
2443 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 938 views
-
- 44 replies
- 9k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 36 replies
- 8.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.6k views
-
Eagle Felon 1 2 3 4
- 46 replies
- 7.8k views
-
- 18 replies
- 3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 983 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.9k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
I was not aware of the Adult adjustment, though totally agree. Years ago I had one of our parents and really involved parents turned down by our lodge for nomination due to his not having ever done a long term. Now this is a man that had done every available training of the time, as he could fit it in. And he had been on a dozen or more weekend backpacks, some up to four nights, and he had done what was then called Trail Boss training with the FS. But, he had tow younger daughters and a wife, and his annual longer term vacation was for family. Thus he did not go to summer camps. When his son was elected, was when we also nominated him as an adult. Fortunately he rethought his emotional response when turned down, and he did not drop out. He finally managed to work out a week at summer camp, but that was three years later. It was, from my perspective, ignorant and short sighted. He had more nights than a number of adults that did get accepted due to summer camps, plus he also was an accomplished welder and building skilled person willing to share his skills. The worst part of that was when I suggested to the Scout Exec that he might wave the summer camp requirement of the time, he refused. Later I went to Jambo and spoke to a couple of OA big shots, and they told me in no uncertain terms that my perspective was nonsense and they would never even consider that. Oh well; he is long in the background, the son is in his thirties and married, and OA is a mess. -
Induction of adults into the OA was never intended to be an "honor"...it was to fulfill the need for adult supervision and advisors to the youth. As such, they are not "elected", but "selected". I agree with the elimination of the camping requirement. -
The camping requirement has been eliminated for adults. -
-
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
Do not remind me of the changes.. Yes, some lodges were doing things wrong. Other lodges were doing it properly. I don't think if the local Native nation has both youth and elders involved with the OA, doing ceremonies, dancing, singing, etc is a problem. Heck one lodge had a tribal councilman as a member, and his cousin was a ceremonialist. Another lodge had a powwow drum started at an OA event. I was active when the change was made. I and a few others said the OA will slowly die as a result of letting everyone in. I gave them 20-25 years. I think the 100th Anniversary gave it a little more life, and of course the patch collectors. OK, I admit, I have read names off of scrolls and the back of shield for AOL and Call Outs. Especially if the pack didn't have anything with their names on it. But completely agree with reading from paper for the main ceremonies. I would rather the "contemplative pause" or even ad libbing the lines, especially if the ceremonialist knew the meaning and purpose of the lines. Instead of using an adult nomination form, they put the SM on the ballot with the youth, and had the Youth vote on him.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)