Jump to content

Camping & High Adventure

Share a camping tip.


Subforums

  1. Equipment Reviews & Discussions

    Discussions dealing with equipment topics (tents, lights, packs, boots, stoves, etc.)

    4.7k
    posts
  2. Camp Recipes and Cooking

    Tales of Scout cooks, prized techniques and yummy recipes for gathering around the fire.

    399
    posts

1906 topics in this forum

    • 24 replies
    • 5k views
    • 24 replies
    • 5k views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 23 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 23 replies
    • 2k views
    • 23 replies
    • 3.6k views
  1. Your mess kit... 1 2

    • 23 replies
    • 3.1k views
  2. hikeing chants 1 2

    • 23 replies
    • 5.6k views
    • 23 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 23 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.9k views
  3. BSA ATV program 1 2

    • 23 replies
    • 5.7k views
  4. Ground cloth 1 2

    • 23 replies
    • 4.3k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • https://forms.gle/L5pHray2RdD4Xt2R9 for those interested n/m - no longer accepting input.
    • "was twice "called to task" for taking nude photographs of Boy Scouts," you need a law to know that was wrong? "two Scouts came forward to say Brock had "relationships with them as well as other members of the troop" and I know for a fact that the types of relationships he was having was hella illegal, even in the 60's.
    • Twice called to task for showing bad pictures?  I agree it's extremely in appropriate, but what 1968 law would have applied?  If we look back on 1960s as the era of free love and redefining society, there is way more to this story than can be read here.   And it 100% misses the time and context.  ...  He was expelled when more came forward.   Yeah, the system worked.  Like so many case law examples, the incidents are ugly and don't show society at it's best.  But, it seems to have worked.  ...  I agree I'd prefer the police were involved.  BUT, that was society in the 1960s.   I'm more upset with so many groups that kept not reporting even in the 1990s, 2000s and even the last few years.  
    • "Clyde A. Brock, a 53-year-old bachelor, was twice "called to task" for taking nude photographs of Boy Scouts, displaying them around his Oregon City home, then showing them off to boys who visited. Yet troop leaders didn't kick him out. Only after two Scouts came forward to say Brock had "relationships with them as well as other members of the troop ...that cannot be condoned" was he expelled from Scouting in 1968.   Scouting executives quietly blacklisted Brock from ever volunteering again, but let him skirt the accusations by writing a letter of resignation citing only his high blood pressure for quitting. Let's see how the system worked: Twice called to task. Not once but twice, Troop leaders did not kick him out. Later had multiple relationships with multiple boys (and we know what that means). He was not reported to police. Allowed him to write a letter of resignation.
    • I don’t exactly. (Plus it was an English translation of the page that I think was originally written by youth. So a lot may have been lost in translation and generationally. ) My impression was that the girls’ organization wasn’t playing well with other scout associations, and the king, having been a scout himself, served as a neutral party with authority. Also, the Swedish scouters who I’ve met were relatively young, and not historians. So their description of their scout movement was limited to their generation. I myself was too immature to strike up a conversation with Carl Gustav, let alone probe him on what it took for he and his fellow citizens to inspire a co-ed scouting organization. Lesson: if you have elders in your family or friends who were scouts, now is the time to interview them on their childhood and young adult experiences.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...