Jump to content

Advancement Resources

Scouting ranks, merit bades, and the advancement programs


2439 topics in this forum

    • 13 replies
    • 1.8k views
  1. Eagle Project Approval

    • 11 replies
    • 1.5k views
  2. Religious award 1 2 3 4

    • 50 replies
    • 5.3k views
    • 27 replies
    • 5.5k views
    • 36 replies
    • 4.5k views
    • 5 replies
    • 921 views
  3. I need some advice

    • 9 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 14 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 916 views
    • 46 replies
    • 5.3k views
  4. Eagle Scout Letters

    • 4 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 49 replies
    • 6k views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 10 replies
    • 1.4k views
  5. Cub Scout Electives

    • 2 replies
    • 907 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • Biggest problem in my neck of the woods is that no one wants to deal with council. Folks are burnt out or frustrated. We had two bright-eyed new volunteers assume a district level position, and within 12 months resigned. They were overworked. We have had pros overrule volunteers on events, i.e. multibooking a location, not ordering enough supplies, or  not even ordering supplies at all. We have had volunteers try to do camp improvements for events, and told "NO." Then the site is not ready. We had volunteers removed from their position when they question the pros, i.e  Why did council take $40K earmarked for the OA to do camp improvements for Conclave and put it in the general fund as a FOS donation. And we had volunteers yelled and screamed at by pros. And when folks do ask for help from council, they are told no.
    • My two cents as a recently-trained SM... 1. I can't speak well to what I thought of the online training because as soon as I decided to take on this role, I dove in: I have copies of Troop Leader Guidebook, volumes 1 & 2, Scoutmaster Handbook, SPL Handbook, PL Handbook, and while I haven't read every word, I've read a lot of it.  I've also tried to gather as much info from online materials (Troop Leader Resources, for example) and groups like this as possible.  So, long way of saying the online training felt redundant, but that's from a skewed perspective. 2.  IOLS was fun, and I did learn one or two new things, as well as getting refreshers on a couple things.  Can't speak to how it's run everywhere, but our Council did a great job.  It was awesome afterward, during a meeting where we were doing advancement, to have a brand-new ASM with almost no scouting experience be more familiar with knots than several of our oldest scouts.  They sure stepped up quick, lol. 3. Wilderness Survival and CPR.  I would take these in a heartbeat, but they are not being offered, as far as I can find, anywhere in the state for the next six months. Why such limited opportunity? 4. All this training doesn't make one a good leader.  I had an incident with about eight scouts going at each other in a group chat, had two scouts physically fighting on one trip, have made numerous mistakes, can't get ANYONE but our Committee Chair and one parent to read emails, and had a scout nearly drown me last Saturday.  Made it through all this, and still feel like I have no clue what I'm doing. And no suggestions on how to make it better.  I'm no Duct Tape.
    • @DuctTape for National Commissioner! It's been a while, and just needed saying 馃槣
    • We often lament the lack of District and/or Council personnel (including commissioners) involvement at the Unit level.  We have an opportunity for changing this AND increasing both hands-on/in-person training. Send the district/council personnel to unit meetings/events to conduct trainings on a regular basis.  This will accomplish more than just those two opportunities, it will also: -increase visibility from district/council. -demonstrate to scouts that adults are also "advancing". -separate the adults from scouts during the scouting event. -allow district/council to observe the unit in action. and more.
    • Just perusing the discussion here, so burned out on training arguments. Per the charter agreement and adult registration paperwork the SM is supposed to be position trained. It's not in the GTSS for some reason, and since most leaders never read the charter, bylaws, or paper registration form it gets overlooked.  National is finally starting to look at this stuff, unit dashboards now focus on CC and Unit Leader being trained. Councils are now being evaluated on the percent of direct contact leaders who are position trained. Sort of a tie in to the UK scouting discussion that was popping in another thread; in the UK position specific training is required or they just drop you (100% trained leader status is one of the reasons why UK scouts has few units, and why it is considered more elite to get in). 
  • Create New...