Council Relations
Discuss issues relating to Scout Councils, districts and working with professionals
680 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 2k views
-
- 34 replies
- 15.2k views
-
- 41 replies
- 11.8k views
-
- 1 reply
- 2.4k views
-
- 28 replies
- 10.1k views
-
- 59 replies
- 18.9k views
-
- 19 replies
- 6.7k views
-
- 63 replies
- 18.7k views
-
- 20 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 11 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 3 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 4 replies
- 3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 5.9k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
I don't know, I took some time this afternoon to research the BOD and it's pretty solid. All members seem to have done well in life and are pumping a lot of money, influence, time, and other resources into the scouting movement. I'll break the BOD down into 5 sub groups. Of the 42 members currently on the BOD, 22 are Eagle Scouts, 1 other that was a scout as a youth but didn't make Eagle; all have been highly recognized in and outside of scouting with awards or decorations. 4 non-scouts that are decorated military veterans; not sure if I would be able to find any other non-scouts that could understand scouting better than people like this. 2 highly recognized professionals in the camping and camping management industry (not counting the ones that are Eagle above). 3 bankruptcy, restructuring, and merger legal experts. 8 highly recognized, decades long volunteers, who have received awards inside and outside of scouting. 2 super rich dudes just doing it for scouting and America. A lot of these people live fairly private lives so there could have been more that were scouts, more that are parents of scouts, this is just a summary of easy to find information on the national website. Over half are Eagle Scouts, seems like a good amount. -
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
IMHO, the OA made a mistake in the 1990s when they changed the election process. Prior to the change, I saw only 1 troop, get all three elected, and the SM told them how to vote so that it was possible. Now having everyone elected is the norm. And they doubled-down on adults with SMs automatically getting in. As for old blood running things instead of the youth, I agree, but it needs to start at the national level first. I do not know what the current stats are, but at one time maybe 10% of the National Committee were youth. -
My friend's camp runs 3 weeks of Scouts BSA at less than 50%. Don't know the $$ side. -
I get the whole shift away from anything first nation related/culturally appropriated; it's an unnecessary headache. I don't think it's the biggest issue at hand though, useless lodges and garbage advisors should be the #1 priority to fix. National was supposed to fix the advisor issue this year but decided to just make it easier for adults to join the OA. There really needs to be some sort of max tenure for advisors to get the old rotten blood out of the lodge leadership structure (yes, let us face it, the youth are not leading the lodges).
-
You're correct. Commissioners are supposed to go into units and basically figure out what is going wrong and helping the unit identify solutions. Again you're correct, no stick; the lack of action in part by professional staff means there is zero motivation for a unit to correct even the easiest to correct issues.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)