Camping & High Adventure
Share a camping tip.
Subforums
-
- 4.7k
- posts
-
- 399
- posts
1939 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 941 views
-
- 27 replies
- 4k views
-
- 17 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 812 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 17 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 30 replies
- 5.7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 876 views
-
- 23 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 899 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 5.2k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
@Tron, Since FOS has dried up, and only 1 unit in the district goes to the local summer camp, The "troop" is being charged $37.50 per Scout in addition to $100 recharter fee. Next year it goes up to $75/Scout. That is in addition to the individual 's national registration fee, council service fee, and insurance fee. That is $120/Scout. So a family with 4 Scouts in the program costs $480 individual fees plus $150 for "Fair Share", plus unit dues. And that doesn't include camp outs and summer camps. I know folks say scouting is cheap compared to sports, but there are a lot of folks who cannot afford to do sports, but could afford Scouting. Not any more. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
Another pet peeve... Scout camps that are not designed around the Patrol Method. What we have mostly these days is a Troop-amoeba campsite with individual Scouts doing their own individually tailored programs during the day. And, they are being given merit badges without having done the work. (Yes, there are exceptions, but this is the general rule, in my observation...) The hidden message is that advancement is the primary purpose of Scouting. If the flagships of the councils, the council-run Summer Camps, are not pushing the Patrol Method, then they work at cross-purposes with units who are trying to do it that way. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
We are not making participation mandatory for Scouts or parents. In Scouting, there really isn't "skin in the game" unless you want to put it there. Yes, this is it. When I had the reins of the Troop, we went camping every month, with two or three big events every summer... 50-miler backpacking trips, week-long beach adventures, 50-miler canoeing, 100+ mile cycling trips, etc. Now that I have pulled back a lot from the Troop, there is no one who is willing to put that much effort into the program. So, the numbers are dwindling. Agree with you wholeheartedly... young men want adventure, not academics. -
Your idea isn't new; the BSA has made these kinds of promises since the creation of the program. I do agree that at this age, cost isn't as much of an issue as the cub program, but a results-based program is very subjective. And most of the time the adults go the easy route of Eagle for their results-based program. However, youth at this age aren't advancement-driven. I found that most Eagle-driven programs lose 70% of their scouts by age 15 because advancement gets boring. Adventure-driven programs thrive because they are fun in the outdoors, and because independence in the patrol method drives more maturity in their growth. Go look at units where scouts age out, and you will find they are more scout-run with adventure. Also, adventure-driven programs typically have a high number of Eagles because the scouts are in the program a long time and earn the Eagle requirements by simply participating. Barry -
Putting on my Membership Chairman hat. Almost 95% of scouts in troops come from the Cubs. If the youth aren't recruited in Cubs, the troops will have to recruit from other sources. When National added additional requirements to the Tiger program in 2000 (increasing meetings to every week, an adult required for each scout), many units were unable to meet the new demands, and the Tiger numbers dropped significantly. That drop became obvious in 2005 when the troop membership suddenly dropped. If you don't get the Cubs, you don't get the crossovers. Barry
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)