Issues & Politics
In answer to many requests, we established a separate forum for these topics. Those not interested can skip this forum instead of spending time reading unwanted messages to identify content.
2942 topics in this forum
-
- 7 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 42 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 7 replies
- 943 views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 92 replies
- 14.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 877 views
-
- 22 replies
- 6.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 747 views
-
- 66 replies
- 5.5k views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 16 replies
- 2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 78 replies
- 6.2k views
-
- 42 replies
- 3.7k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By OaklandAndy · Posted
Totally agree! We actually work with the local multicultural community center in town. We are starting our first, hopefully not last, pack yard sale with all proceeds going to the center to help support their after-school and summer programs. In turn, hopefully we have enough exposure to recruit some of those youth that go to the center. If not, oh well. That was never the aim anyways. -
They know the deal when they sign up. Usually they are friends with someone in the Pack. We get most of them back. -
Now we are talking about BSA in general. You are way off on the homosexual vs bisexual comment. The great majority of pedophiles are heterosexual. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/ On whether the Boy Scouts did their best... I don't think I can add anything that will change your mind but note that your description of how an SE or TCC would have analyzed the situation has no mention of doing the right thing and is all about liability and reputation. -
By johnsch322 · Posted
This is Hooey, When the initial allegations came forward about the nude photos he could have been removed as a member of the BSA period. There is no god given right to be an adult member of BSA. How many young boys could have been saved? And they did have standing as he was part of their organization. Taking nude photos of young boys and having sexual relationships with them is neither homosexuality or bisexuality. How can you possibly say they removed the threat as best they could when after the nude photos came up they allowed him access to children. That is called gross negligence. -
You misunderstood what I was saying: my recent posts are not about one single instance.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)