Scouts with Disabilities
Where parents and scouters go to discuss unique aspects to working with kids with special challenges.
76 topics in this forum
-
- 21 replies
- 709 views
-
- 1 reply
- 206 views
-
- 6 replies
- 328 views
-
- 9 replies
- 907 views
-
- 2 replies
- 409 views
-
- 11 replies
- 807 views
-
- 2 replies
- 716 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1485 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1456 views
-
- 7 replies
- 985 views
-
- 3 replies
- 971 views
-
- 0 replies
- 792 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1300 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1053 views
-
- 15 replies
- 2363 views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
It would depend on why the governor limited it. If it was an arbitrary "hey, I think patrol based Scouting is the way to go", then yes, I think most everyone would summarily ignore that. If it was based on COVID, then I think everyone would comply. Like anything, it's a factor of why. -
By 69RoadRunner · Posted
I'm so old, I can remember when this was about adult family members being one to one with child family members. -
By CynicalScouter · Posted
Given the potential legal liability? I would hope every single one. Given the obligation each unit and council has to comply with the law? I would hope every single one. EDIT: Note that national's policy on this is that this is taken directly from the Guide to Safe Scouting: units and council may camp "absent any legal constraints." A governor's (lawful, not overturned by the courts) limitation like the one above? That's a legal constraint. -
I can't believe I'm saying this but thank you for making the connection between porn and scouts. 😀 Now we're closer to back on track. -
If a governor limited youth camping to "groups of no greater than 10 close friends from the same neighborhood, adult supervision and other groups no closer than 100 yards," how many council/units would comply?
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)