Jump to content

Going to the next Jamboree?

A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering


263 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 498 views
    • 3 replies
    • 3.3k views
    • 103 replies
    • 27.6k views
    • 10 replies
    • 4.3k views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.4k views
    • 13 replies
    • 4.1k views
  1. Registration

    • 1 reply
    • 2.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.1k views
  2. First WSJ help!!

    • 3 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.4k views
    • 3 replies
    • 3k views
  3. WSJ 2019 Application

    • 3 replies
    • 3.5k views
  4. WSJ 2019 selection 1 2

    • 24 replies
    • 11.2k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • While I can understand your perspective on the use of the "perversion files", I feel that is not constructive to "fixing" things.  The IV files were more than mos groups or organizations attempted, and even with this additional untenable episode, YP is still better than most other groups and I have read is a guide for others that finally choose to do something.  Most of the people in the IV files were not deviants, or so it appears.  The sad fact is that we have sick people in the larger society that are always trying to get around any protections and prey on the weak and less mature.  And we still have far too many government agencies that are worse, in some respects, than the predators, since they take payoffs or whatever or simply do not want to make the efforts for some reason.  So, we that continue towork at it must be vigilant and pray that we keep most of them out and away.  Zero tolerance is wonderful, but it also will NOT stop a few sick people.    
    • Agreed. Though often I do not want their "help" as they do not understand the program hence their complaints. 
    • Agree with staking to the ground. Making tent pegs is a great way to use the saw, axe, knife  skills on a regular basis. Often we complain about one&done, or advancement reqs as separate from program. This is how to incorporate it. If the books&magazines don't show it, the adult patrol can certainly model it. Scout: wow mister, how did you set up your guys tarp without any tent stakes or line-locs. ASM Smith: look here, we made a couple pegs with our hatchet & knife. Tied the tarp to them with a taut-line hitch. Each of us made one peg, so it only took a few minutes. Mister Peabody never made one, so I showed him how.  Scout: Neat Mister Smith, can you show me? ASM: I could, but better yet  how about Mr. Peabody shows you while I watch. Then you can show the rest of your patrol while Mr. Peabody watches. Scout: Swell. Can I get my assistant patrol leader to come watch too? ASM: certainly. We willbe right here.  
    • I agree. I also would add I have no idea what any of us are getting for the $85 membership fee that goes to National HQ.    Sorry if I sound jaded with HQ as of late; I am.
    • Scouting is becoming more expensive but it isn't super expensive. One of my units recently got a family back from sports. They had pulled all of their kids and pumped them into baseball and after a year of the costs of organized baseball they came right back to scouting.  I think the expensive part of scouting is hidden by bad units and units that are too reliant on district/council based programming. One of the troops that I help with is getting ready to do its big fall campout and the cost for a weekend is currently at $70 a person. I'm struggling to understand why, with our state parks and how cheap it is to camp in them the cost should be more in line with $20 a person (for a 2 night 3 day campout).  The council fees are ridiculous. Michigan is $85 a person which is the highest in my neck of the woods. I look across the council line and I have no idea what they are getting for that $85 that we are not getting in my council and we're barely paying a council fee here. 
×
×
  • Create New...