Jump to content

Going to the next Jamboree?

A place to chat about Scouting's biggest gathering


261 topics in this forum

  1. Cost?

    • 9 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.5k views
  2. Cubs Visiting Jambo

    • 8 replies
    • 2k views
    • 10 replies
    • 2k views
    • 32 replies
    • 7.9k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 8 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 16 replies
    • 3.5k views
  3. Early Arrival.

    • 4 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 5 replies
    • 2.4k views
  4. Equipment for Jambo

    • 8 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 22 replies
    • 3.8k views
  5. extra costs 1 2

    • 15 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 2 replies
    • 2.2k views
  6. Fee For Faith ?

    • 11 replies
    • 3.9k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • A few reasons why this may be the case, but I do not know. 1. MBCs are now a paid  position, so they are now included 2. the 18-21 crowd, the 'Adult participants" are now being included 3. A lot of folks are getting tired of the constant increases in prices.
    • @BetterWithCheddar, I also appreciate the courage to share, and the gentle reminder to not accidentally imply that all individuals who had a gender-segregated scouting experience failed to learn how to work with the opposite gender respectfully. The folks on our committee who scouted gender-segregated are quite well-adjusted and respectful. I see and hear other examples of that in media and on the Internet. So, if you don't mind explaining some more - is the view you're expressing an adult-looking-back view, then, rather than what you were thinking at the time? What were your friend groups like, did you have any that were single gender? And how did you stop peacocking? (I assume you no longer do what you did back then, even when you are actively trying to catch a particular woman's romantic attention.) The reason I ask is that while I've certainly seen peacocking, I don't remember seeing much of it in middle school (but that was long ago so maybe I didn't notice or don't remember), and middle school was when girls and boys in my town started to form mixed-gender friend groups spontaneously after the "cooties" period in elementary school. There was kind of a redefining of gender relationships to reduce overall tension as people let go of some fixed ideas about what girls and boys were like, and people sorted themselves more along interest and personality lines and disregarded gender except for romantic pursuits. Almost like now that we were starting to turn into men and women, we could stop role-playing gender and just do what we wanted. So for me, middle school was a time of relaxation into friendships with boys - and I do mean friendships - in a way that sounds almost opposite to your experience.   
    • Just saw our council's numbers... from a year ago at this time, we are down almost 8% of our youth numbers, and almost 12% of our adult numbers. The patient is very ill. And, I noted something curious... our registered adult to youth ratio? 1 : 1.8 We have one registered adult for every 1.8 youth in the council...  I am cogitating on that one for a while. Thoughts?
    • Our GT hasn't been over 5 at any point since we charted it in 2021. They elect an SPL rather than PL, and male SPL/female SPL share responsibilities they work out between them on opening/closing and planning. On outdoor weekends, they function as their own patrol so if only two attend, they divide all their responsibilities amongst the two (cooking, KP duty, etc.). I too have seen true co-ed units as well though. One unit near me, they had only a single SPL in 2022 for "the two units", and happened to be a girl that was elected. I used the co-ed Den example in another post  of what these pilots amount to. Our pack had 2 females when that pilot was announced, not in the same age, but had one DL assigned that worked with them together (1 was Bear, the other AoL). Council flat out told the Cubmaster to opt into the pilot, as many other units were already doing it co-ed anyway. These pilots aren't to "discover something new", they are to affirm where others are already going rouge.  
    • 🙄  = on paper only 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...