Advancement Resources
Scouting ranks, merit bades, and the advancement programs
2443 topics in this forum
-
- 18 replies
- 13.3k views
-
- 40 replies
- 9.3k views
-
UNOFFICIAL Guide to Earning Eagle Scout: for Parents and Scouts: a step-by-step strategy to achieve Scouting's highest rank 1 2
- 19 replies
- 6.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 23 replies
- 4.5k views
-
- 22 replies
- 9.8k views
-
- 101 replies
- 22.8k views
-
- 35 replies
- 9.8k views
-
- 44 replies
- 8.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 2k views
-
- 13 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 15 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.7k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
That is what the Chipmunk rank expansion is for -- to boost the numbers up before the end of 2026. Allowing everyone to recharter in February also means that membership numbers from year end 2026 now through to whatever the new recharter grace period is (May?) will be inflated. That means that in 2027, unless Chipmunk completely fails or numbers really continue to trend down and tank, we will likely be seeing and hearing of claims of membership growth. -
It is pretty normal for an org to talk about their year-end numbers as their numbers. This year, 2026, isn't over yet. -
The 877K number was reported as membership is the Dec 25 report. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
My bet is that the number includes multiples. So, a Cub Scout that crosses over this year counts as two memberships. A Scout in a Troop who is also a Venturer counts as two memberships. I suspect it also includes all those who were on the rolls until recently. That is, if a youth had a renewal due in early 2026, but did not renew, they still count as a youth served in the program for the year. It would be telling to see a breakdown of the criteria for inclusion into the 887K number. I'd bet that net is as wide as possible -
Im not sure. I think they might be reporting "total unique youth served" which may include LFL AND other headcount or NO LFL and other headcount. I have not completely figured out the total unique youth served calculation. Regardless, you are correct, something is off in how numbers are being reported.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)