Unit Fundraising
Ideas for fundraising projects and programs for your unit.
436 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 1.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 18 replies
- 6.8k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2k views
-
- 11 replies
- 3.7k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
God help him if he gets someone like my district advancement chair or the past previous. A board of review depends on the rank. For Scout - 1st Class my goal is 15min or less and focused on the scout experience and keying up on the best and worst experience of the scout on those rank journeys; I generally want myself and fellow board members to ask no more than 3 questions each. Star and Life I start asking multiple questions on the same topics, the boards start getting longer, 30-45min. I've sat on many EBORS over the year, they go long, too long, 2 hours or so, always a 6 person panel. National will not just give it to him. In my time we have only failed one person and national had no mercy for them or the troop. This is not the point of the BOR, especially not at the earlier ranks. These earlier ranks are gauging the scout experience, the health of the unit, blindspots to take back to the scoutmaster corps. Correct. -
By RememberSchiff · Posted
Reminder, even if one has a subscription, one cannot entirely copy monetized, copyrighted articles from behind a paywall for scouter.com members. Summarize in your own words and cite source is preferred and then only quote a paragraph or two and definitely include a source link. Boy Scouts Claimants Look To Remove Slater, Citing Probe By Jeff Montgomery · Law360 (October 15, 2025, 8:23 PM EDT) --Alleging trial lawyer case aggregators at Slater Slater Schulman have "run amok" in the Boy Scouts sexual abuse case, a claimants group has moved for a bankruptcy court order terminating contingency fee legal service agreements with victims and a reduction in fees paid to the firm... For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com. More at source (requires subscription): https://www.law360.com/articles/2399912/boy-scouts-claimants-look-to-remove-slater-citing-probe @Eagle1993 @MattR -
By HashTagScouts · Posted
Especially for Scouts on the younger end, you don't want a BOR to crush their spirit, so making the knots a game just makes it light-hearted. Just encourage them to keep trying later on- "that's OK [Sam], I get my fingers twisted sometimes too. But I'll do this every know and then to challenge myself". Again, the intent of BOR is not re-test and search for reason to not pass them- every BOR I saw as means to evaluate how we were doing as a program for discussion to the SM. Hopefully the SM can work that feedback into discussion with the SPL and PLC- "I think it would be good if next month we find an activity to include in a troop meeting to practice knots". -
Regarding length of a lower rank BOR, 15 minutes would be about right, so four a night doesn’t sound far fetched. -
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
There are ways to find out if someone actually did requirements via discussion and not retesting. And remember, the G2A states: "The purpose of the review is to determine the quality of the candidate’s experience and decide whether the youth is qualified to advance. " (emphasis added). Page 29, 4.4.2.1. "Still, if any member dissents, the decision cannot be for approval. In the case of such disagreement, ... As indicated below the Scout is only told what improvements need to be made." P. 56 "If a board does not approve, the candidate must be so informed and told what can be done to improve...a follow-up letter must be promptly sent to a Scout of any rank who is turned down." So a Board of Review is suppose to make sure work was actually done, and can deny approval for advancement. But appeals will get approved.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)