Let's quote sources that don't have an agenda against the guy. The NYT? Really? Why not CNN or MSNBC? C'mon guys at least try to find a credible news source, not ones that slipped Hillary the questions prior to the debates.
I'd be more concerned about a Scoutmaster making physical contact with my kid. That's a way bigger problem than your son advancing. There's no way that behavior is appropriate by any adult let alone the Scoutmaster. I'd talk to your council about that.
The Guide to Advancement is online and contains all the rules the troop must follow. I'd look there to build your case. I'd also find another troop but make sure your get your records from this one first.
Melting pot take away bravado? I invite you to watch a pretty woman walk down a street in brooklyn during a work week. You don't get much more meting pot than that.
We agree more women will make males less likely to act like animals.
You had to work for Palms after Eagle with the old rules. Not sure I get your point.
Under the new rules guys are getting Palms for no extra work. Under the old program they would have had to earn them.
And some cultures where public rapes in major cities on public buses still happen.
Not sure I buy the argument that International males are more likely to appreciate women more than American males. I do buy that there will be more women present and so any males will be less likely to act as such.
Unless your troop has a policy that defines what active participation means you have no grounds to judge is activity level. Whether he's attend one or all of your events he's eligible to run and up to the boys to decide.
Now the Scoutmaster can develop objectives the SPL must fulfill to get credit for his leadership position, one of those can be attendance at troop events during his tenure.
It's not the 11 year olds waking around and harassing the girls. It's the hormone laiden 14-17 year olds traveling in packs. Mostly they were from big cities. Besides I think 12 is the base age to go to Jamboree. I hear it used to be 13 or 14.
I think you misread a great deal. All of the replies addressing harassment were supportive of stopping it. Other posts were addressing the stealing. No one equated the sexual harassment to loose change.
So let's get rid of all signs of respect then?
Ask this: Why wear them inside? Because you want to show off your "cool" hat? You're afraid of "hat head"? You're bald?
You write this in the same thread where people are advocating limiting the free speech of a sitting President???
I swear, what would guys do if you couldn't complain about Trump? I'm glad someone is protecting our right to free speech.
Admirable. But destroying Boy Scouts for the millions in it is not the answer. Getting girls in to Venturing or having Girl Scouts fix their own program is the answer.
Appropriate speech? At least he gave one.
Given the topics and politics BSA has played lately, is there really any topic off the table these days?
Anyone see the "Keep the 'Boy' in Boy Scouts" signs.
You can make the Texas flag in to anything...as long as you're Texan.
@@JasonG172, a pledge I took everyday for 10 years. "Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible."