Scoutmaster Minutes
Inspirational stories and meaningful remarks to share
Subforums
-
- 11
- posts
215 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 124 views
-
- 2 replies
- 353 views
-
- 1 reply
- 238 views
-
- 0 replies
- 723 views
-
- 18 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 210 replies
- 12.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 533 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 657 views
-
- 0 replies
- 687 views
-
- 2 replies
- 968 views
-
- 14 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 1 reply
- 809 views
-
- 0 replies
- 827 views
-
- 2 replies
- 874 views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
What’s the daily burn rate these days? Not my bailiwick, but if she can ditch a mediator with a flick of her wand, it would seem so. Right? In the event that happens, the “substantial contribution” argument by which they advanced the request (demand?) for payment of BrownRudnick’s fees would almost certainly go bye bye. Substantial contributor and obstructionist perch on the opposite ends of the teeter totter, me thinks. -
May not be a bad idea. That could shake things up a bit. I don't think she has been happy with the coalition (asking for payments from BSA, fights between Kosnoff/KR, etc.) She sees that the voting percent didn't hit high enough and now this mess. Perhaps use it as a threat for now. -
By RememberSchiff · Posted
In July-August, 2020 the Judge included the "Coalition of Abused Scouts for Justice" as part of the Mediation Party. https://casedocs.omniagentsolutions.com/cmsvol2/pub_47373/842768_1161.pdf Could the Judge also remove the "Coalition" from the Mediation Party? -
Amazing how weeks and months pass so easily. -
New hearing set January 24, 2022 at 2:30 p.m. (Eastern Time) Microsoft Word - Boy Scouts - Motion to Clarify Scope of Discovery - Notice of Hearing 4863-1975-2202 v.1 (omniagentsolutions.com) Right now it is about the coalition law firms who are not complying with the judge's ruling about discovery (per insurance companies).
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)