Patch Trading Central
Have a patch or memorabilia you're looking to swap? Use this virtual patch trading blanket. (This area is intended to facilitate memorabilia swapping, not necessarily commerce.)
377 topics in this forum
-
- 6 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 843 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.1k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
Be patient with my statement. I am one that viewed the IVF files as doing something where organizations didn't. And in many ways, I still believe that. ... I won't go into the thought process now. With that said, the re-entrant issue I can understand. Experienced scouters have always seen the challenges getting rosters and training records right. We would have people missing from the roster for years or people still on the roster that had been gone. I remember realizing registrars often had a district file with post-it-notes with apps that were missing signatures or did not have money or recently training certificate.... They were waiting for the DE or a unit volunteer to come in and help address the issue.. Other times, an in-between person (volunteer or professional) would forget to drop off the app. It's only in the last decade where the roster is "mostly" current. AND, only this decade where it's emphasized that all the paperwork needs to be processed before you volunteer. This seems to follow a larger trend. Our local schools are doing that too. In 2004, I helped at my kid's elementary school. No app. No ID. Nothing. Just showed up. Now, you can't help at school or chaperone or ... without first comleting the background check. So, ... I can fully see how the paper systems were really hard to track volunteers when they slightly changed their name or moved between states. -
It's worth remembering that starting out that's what they thought they were doing, and it looked like they might be. At 1/10th the number of claimants the opt out payment is $35,000 and everyone is looking at minimum 10x the amount of compensation. That looks a lot more like the "equitable compensation" they were talking about, and it probably gets a quick approval and we're already post bankruptcy. -
I think you are absolutely right. I have been saying similar things for years in multiple threads. I've had a very weird career but among other things I've worked in PR and news and organizational dynamics. This has mostly been self inflicted and is self perpetuated. -
Does that mean I'm right? (Please say, "YES.") -
By johnsch322 · Posted
You are correct this has evolved into FUBAR territory.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)
There are no registered users currently online