Forum Support & Announcements
Forum support and announcements from SCOUTER.com
Subforums
192 topics in this forum
-
- 23 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 16 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 20 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 7 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 17 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 24 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 13 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 20 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 9 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 16 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 21 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 21 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 16 replies
- 3.2k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By MYCVAStory · Posted
Interesting. www.bsarestructering.org goes to a "site not found" message for me. Regardless, neither are very accurate! 🙂 -
They both go to the same site. -
By MYCVAStory · Posted
I think this is the specific link: https://www.bsarestructuring.org/estimated-potential-payment-calculator/ BUT.....BUT.....this does NOT take into account any scaling factors that would increase or decrease awards and assumes that all claims can be funded at 100%. It's merely a simplified way to look at the matrix and apply it to open and closed States. I fear that this calculator and others that law firms have posted are setting expectations that are best guesses or worse, at best. The only way to truly get an idea of a claim "value" is to do a deep dive into Article VII (I believe), the TDP portion, in the plan. There's also a 50-minute video on the TCC site discussing this. -
By the way, you also don't need an adult present when Scout skills are learned for advancement. Get those adults out of those groups, registered or not, and let the Scouts teach the skills. Let the older Scouts sign the younger Scouts off on the requirements. Only then does an adult need to be involved. -
No, you don't need an MBC present when skills are learned. The MBC only needs to be the one to sign off when the Scout has completed the requirements to the satisfaction of the MBC.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)