qwazse

Sure. The boys would love it. Mike Walton gives some details on this http://www.scoutinsignia.com/eagmedal.htm And B&G is as formal as it gets in the Cub world. Although, I never did. Figured my shirt with the knot for Eagle and AoL was plenty.

I'm sorry, but by not having a trained trusted and dedicated COR, the old charter gave up its birthright for whatever bowl of soup they were being fed. I am in a similar position of dealing with my CO who fielded nominal CORs for consecutive years. One self-interested scouter could have had them move their troop unit number to a CO just down the road where our boys merged with another troop. If it weren't for the boys voting down the idea, it could have been done without argument. And a CO that doesn't have the time in their agenda to spare one of its three services for scout Sunday recognition would have gotten a number with a reputation it had zero effort in building. Unless someone in the original CO fields a rep willing to stand up for it, they will lose their scouting program.

If the boys say "we'd like to stay Merry Archers" ... sounds like they came up with their patrol name. It could just as easily go the other way "We're fed up with archery, can we be siege engineers?" Still made up a name. Regardless, the challenge is having the boys settle on what they want -- not just what they think will make us happy ... that they've listened to each other, and if one one boy really wants something a little different, that they figure out how to make him feel like he's contributed ... and convincing them that we scouters are proud of them for their hard work.

Best committee training was through 75 yards of laurel thicket suggested as a shortcut by the SM! His GPS really paid for itself that day. But on the plus side, the smaller the boy, the faster he could get through that stuff. So it wound up that the were necessarily the ones figuring out the next move with the skills that they had.

Shift, It is a shame this has happened. But BSA is quite intentional about staying out of organizations' property squabbles. If a CO backs down from their right to source a scouting program, it's on them. If they want to clear old debts without regard to who was actually responsible, it's on them. If another CO wants to give these scouters a second chance, it's on them. If the old CO (either actively or passively) opts to absorb liability and transfer assets, it's on them. The scouters are free to join any CO that will have them. The CO will only get a call from National HQ if they were charged with a crime. And even then, depending on the offense, the CO has the option to conclude that they'll still will accept the scouters to lead a unit under their sponsorship. One thing that BSA pro's will not do, is block scouts' membership in a unit over shenanigans like these. If your Scout Executive doesn't see the need to insist on revoking a charter, all parties are stuck with whatever hot potatoes they're holding. Does it make BSA unappealing? I guess so. Last year, I had a risk-averse CO turn down a Pack because of concerns over being saddled with burdens like these.

The scouters involved created a hot mess. The CO should have stuck to its guns over the assets. The new CO should have been informed that the scouters were brokering in bad faith. Should BSA be involved? Well, unless criminal charges were filed, how would they know to suspend these scouters' memberships?

Latin Scot, that was supposed to be a thumbs up.

Senator Ryan must have been reading these blogs, thus his desire to lower corporate income tax. The booster club illustration is out of context ... The fundraising for one member was on the scale of $10,000+ annually -- required for membership. Thus the IRS declared that to be an individual benefit. So, it would be disingenuous to rule one youth organization's fees as an individual benefit and another a corporate benefit. Scale matters. It matters a lot.

it's like some in my committee have evil twins. My replies: I've eaten plenty of burnt toast, you can too. Soap washes young hands faster than old. This is a youth lead movement, it ought to taste that way. I have not dealt with the parking lot excuse. I guess I just kept walking.

Maybe you could start with a map book: http://www.scouting.org/scoutsource/OutdoorProgram/Properties/Region%20and%20Area%20Maps.aspx Let the boys figure out the patch for each council.

Get your PLC to reflect on e last CoH. Ask what went well, what didn't go so well, and what they'd like to do differently. Sometimes boys don't want to change a thing. Other times they have real novel ideas. Just get them in the habit of reflecting, one or two tweaks will come to the fore.

Our youth love helping out the CO (a small church that none of them attend) with service projects. The CO loves letting the boys use the hall for our annual fundraiser. We use up space ... which in this day and age is as good as $. Never would we consider asking them for financial support.

Hmm, that's how I did it with my boys. Now granted, that workbook has gotten absurdly verbose. And for some scouts with learning disorders, we had to walk them through it (again, and again). But, each boy is unique, and although they all face the same deadline (a stupid one, I've come to conclude), they each have different obstacles to meeting it -- from the MBs they have yet to do to how the districts handle approvals to the hoops a beneficiary would like you to jump through. (E.g., Son #1 had to attend a town meeting to garner public support for his project.) Because there is no one-size-fits all, an Eagle advisor is probably the best resource a boy could have.

Somebody somewhere is tweeting shame on GS/USA for being patriotic and not partisan? My only public post regarding GS/USA is: "Hey, girl scouts, I have a door, and a phone. Your moms' cookie sells announcement mean nothing to me."

Talk to your troop committee chair and see if someone in your troop can sign up to counsel it. (You might have to share a copy of the requirements so people know what you're talking about. If not, ask at your district round-table for someone to volunteer to help your son. Anyone who does field surveys as part of his/her job would make a great counselor: biology/geology/anthropology departments at many colleges, museums, heck I know one guy who traveled the world looking for new plants at pharmaceuticals. It sounds like a fun badge, and your son is "paving the way" for other scouts to enjoy it!

Why not divide everything by 5 and make the scale that much simpler? Also, I think there should be away to incorporate the uniform inspection sheet ... Average score divided by 10? Anyway the proof will be in the pudding. I think you're close enough for a road test. Have the boys give it a try and ask them how they'd tweak it.

Works now! Regarding the PLC, you always need their buy-in. Most things in life are really a negotiation. In the examples I put forward, the SM might be seeing something getting in the way of boys achieving the pinnacle scouting experience, so he initiates the change. It's entirely possible that a boy sees the need for change. That happened with our troop last year. TG started bailing out the SPL, and I started giving him advice on being a better SPL. He pointed out that that wasn't his position. I made it clear that I advise according who I see doing the work, not who's wearing the patch. The SM moved up the election schedule, and no boys disagreed.

It's like I have an evil twin! As soon as I got handed that Advisor patch, I started getting cross-talk from untrained scouters on "how it's gonna be done." Two things that served as a sanity check: Council VOA and advisors who confirmed that I may be crazy, but I'm also right. The Area 4 Venturing Commissioner who told me to check out scouter.com.

Something about @@NJCubScouter's link was throwing it off. Cutting and pasting the edited link above seems to work. As far as I'm concerned, @@Stosh's process is still an election. An Israel-in-the-era-of-judges kind of election, but one nonetheless. Bottom line: BSA allows a wide envelope on how things should be done. I've encouraged our SM to be more flexible about the timing of SPL elections, calling boys on the carpet if they aren't showing up for their PoR's. On the other hand, imagine once @@Stosh's troop has about 40 boys, and if they turn all cynical and want to rotate a different boy through SPL every week ... I suspect at that point, he'll set the boys down and demand a little more stability. SM's should set schedules and qualifications based on what their boys need to achieve the pinnacle scouting experience of hiking and camping independently with their mates ... not on what parents are telling them Johnny needs to advance.

Give him a BSA Adult application and pay for his assistant scoutmaster training. IMHO, there is no greater honor than being entrusted to tend to the well-being of our nation's youth.

Hi DS. Long time no read! Never understood why last minute MB completion should stress anybody out. Either the scout starts and ends the badge in a timely fashion ... or he does not. I try to teach scouts and venturers backdating. (E.g., get some graph paper -- or even a real paper calendar -- and count back from their target date when they must take particular actions.) They trivialize the method, and as a result, some have not made Eagle. Their problem, not mine, not their parents'.

BPSA seems to have peaked as well. I gathered from their website there was a leadership transition. I certainly hope they gain a little momentum.

@@Jarmfam, welcome to the forums! General rule: Let the Boy Scout Handbook and the Scoutmaster's Handbook be your guide. If those documents don't give a restriction, it means troops have latitude. You most definitely want your SPL to be a lad the other PL's trust and someone who wants to continue to develop his leadership and management skills. So, yes, if an incumbent wants to ask the troop to allow him to retain his office, encourage him to do so. A boy on his second term (however long a term is in your troop) can learn more about tour planning, vision casting, and training his replacement(s). From the school of hard knocks: Never dole out leadership positions based on need for rank advancement. Ban adults from bribing boys to projects by saying "It counts for service hours." Merit badge classes during troop meetings: no. Meet the counselor evenings: yes. It's not a problem if it takes five years to become a first class scout. The advancement method helps with skills acquisition only. For skills retention one needs the patrol and outdoor method. Patrols need physical distance (up to 300' if you have an open field, their own rooms if your chartered organization is that generous).

One of our former scouts and his wife are taking a 6 week "fast" from social medial. In the process he has purged his "friends" list down to something over 100. Evidently I made the first cut.

Not there, but possibly along the way. Figuring out how to make folk's cells robust against radiation damage is as much part of cancer treatment delivery as it is of astronautics. Figuring out how to corral radiation around a "safe capsule" has even broader applications in development of medical devices. I'm not as glib as David CO about the supremacy of robotics. It's taken tremendous effort to get state-of-the-art probes to do a fraction of the jobs that manned missions could do. The "long road" -- i.e. being earthly minded for a couple of generations -- is giving us tools for very long journeys which will help our grandchildren be of some heavenly good.