Council Relations
Discuss issues relating to Scout Councils, districts and working with professionals
677 topics in this forum
-
- 11 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 11 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 6 replies
- 2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.7k views
-
- 5 replies
- 2k views
-
- 18 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 20 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.8k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
I would not call it theft, because council does ask the CO for the assets. In my limited experience with this, though, the CO's usually do not understand the stuff is theirs to keep, just earmarked for future Scouting. Does "predatory opportunism" better describe the practice? -
Pretty sure that's theft. As others have mentioned, the CO technically is the holder of the assets of the unit. It's why a lot of troop trailers are registered by the CO, insured by the CO, etc. They're not Council assets, they belong to the CO. Folding the troop doesn't default the assets to Council. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
LOL, I have two Eagle Scouts at Pitt who could bring some gear home on Thanksgiving break. Our Troop is looking for some flint and steel sets, draw knives for shaving spars, and an axe or two, if they are 3/4 axes. If you have any of that, we'd be happy to make sure it continues a life in Scouting. (Also, canoe paddles... Scouts are merciless on that gear 😜 ) One day, I'll get out that way and have a coffee with you... -
By RememberSchiff · Posted
Scouts Lawyer Seeks to ‘Shine a Light’ on Mass Tort System Flaws ..."In the Boy Scouts case, former clients of Slater Slater Schulman LLP approached Friedman, he said, after the settlement trustee said she stopped processing thousands of Slater claims for irregularities. The New York-based firm acknowledged its claims were being investigated over “procedural and factual problems.” A Delaware judge next week is scheduled to hear Friedman’s unusual request to take over some Slater clients and, more pointedly, reduce or outright deny Slater’s 40% contingency fees in the case, which he estimates could top $50 million. Slater on Thursday lashed back at Friedman, filing a response that called his motion an improper bid to interfere with their clients and “wholly untethered to any recognized legal authority.” Friedman insists he didn’t seek out the role or the clients, saying that they approached him after reading his past public criticisms about mass tort firms gaming the system. “I didn’t ask for this,” he told Bloomberg Law last week in an interview near his Stuart, Fla. home. But the lawyer sees it as a golden opportunity to go beyond talking and writing about the need for change. With clients in the case, he can actively litigate the problems he says have followed mass torts into the bankruptcy system." More at source: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/scouts-lawyer-seeks-to-shine-a-light-on-mass-tort-system-flaws -
Having closed and reopened once (and now with fairly robust numbers), I have tried to keep our assets lean. It’s hard to do with a steady stream of donations. Two months ago, we got a hundred flea market knives. Food donations covered the booth at a local carnival. Weekend campground fees are paid for the year. Last week we were given brand new axes. We are looking for troops who need gear, but that would require successful launching, which the council is not doing. I continue to encourage the committee to not have revenue in excess of expenses. The last thing we need is a huge balance in our checking account.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)
- There are no registered users currently online