Council Relations
Discuss issues relating to Scout Councils, districts and working with professionals
678 topics in this forum
-
- 67 replies
- 13.2k views
-
- 26 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 39 replies
- 8.5k views
-
- 21 replies
- 4k views
-
- 17 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 23 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 25 replies
- 4.4k views
-
- 28 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 16 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 36 replies
- 7.8k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 79 replies
- 15.2k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
I don't think this was a blunder. From what I have witnessed this was a good thing. Just to be clear as to what I was seeing in my area; we had a pack charging $500 pack dues and blaming council & national. Now that it has become infinitely harder for that pack to munge all the dues together at 1 point in the year and blame recharter, council, national, santa claus, and whomever else for the steep fees that pack is down to single digit membership because all of the cubs in that area are going to other packs now. Whatever happens going forward membership cannot overlap with recharter; membership with national and council "service fees" have to be clearly defined so as to prevent bad units from scalping parents. -
I want to give an update on the Trust Claim submissions by the Slater firm. I spoke to my attorney Larry Friedman. The 3rd party neutral which Slater claims must pass through before they can proceed to the Trust for evaluation is identifying inconsistencies between survivors Omni Proof of Claims and their Trust Claim questionnaires. Larry and his teams work has found MOST of these are the result of extremely sloppy work by Slater attorneys when preparing their clients documents. A little over a month ago, I received an AIR (additional information request) from the Trust. This was due to sloppy work by Slater attorneys. Larry submitted the information that was requested on my behalf and less than 30 days later I received my award determination. I am ecstatic with my claim determination and have submitted my acceptance package. Even this late in the process survivors represented by Slater, past and present, should have a qualified professional helping them respond to Trust AIR's. If anyone would like Larry's contact info, I would be happy to provide it. I'm sure everyone is aware that Slater is placing liens on their former clients awards. Larry and the Trust are putting in a process to escrow the attorney fees needed to satisfy the liens. This means the 36% of our claims Slater is putting a lien on will be held in an interest bearing escrow account and the remaining 64% can be distributed to survivors. This way the Trust can continue processing and paying claims to Slater clients. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
If they do, in fact, roll this back, I will be impressed that National will have taken prudent steps after recognizing this blunder. Now let's see how long it takes to make the change. -
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
WOW, who could have predicted rolling registration would be a "Charley Foxtrot?" 🤔 -
I fired the Slater firm back in October and retained Larry Friedman and Tim Silverman as new council. I received my claim determination a little over a week ago. I've spoken to a numb of other survivors over the past week that also fired Slater and hired Larry and Tim. They also have received claim determinations as well. All of us still had to be vetted by the independent neutral even though we retained new council. I believe hiring Larry and Tim had a lot to do with our claims starting to be determined over the past week.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)