Jump to content

Advancement Resources

Scouting ranks, merit bades, and the advancement programs

2316 topics in this forum

    • 3 replies
    • 216 views
    • 13 replies
    • 440 views
    • 28 replies
    • 853 views
  1. Wrong on so many levels

    • 9 replies
    • 303 views
    • 25 replies
    • 711 views
    • 8 replies
    • 2261 views
  2. yes or no?

    • 20 replies
    • 502 views
    • 19 replies
    • 371 views
    • 4 replies
    • 589 views
    • 37 replies
    • 624 views
    • 28 replies
    • 1193 views
    • 6 replies
    • 228 views
    • 10 replies
    • 448 views
    • 5 replies
    • 222 views
    • 23 replies
    • 540 views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • Wow, this is an old thread! The question came up in another context and found this looking for insight here. Since the thread was last updated, there have been some developments, at least according to this http://www.scoutinsignia.com/cnclknot.htm:  
    • Wonder how many of us would fail it. Likewise, how many of us would fail a written driver's test if we had to take it today. When you're about to take one of these tests, that's when you are studying the material and have the ability to pass it. The goal is to retain some of the information, not all of it, and to just have a good general understanding of the subject. I really don't believe it's any indicator of current civic aptitude if a lot of people couldn't pass the test. It's a very specific test, with a lot of information that people past school age really aren't being regularly exposed to. So if the question is if we should modify the MB to cover the citizenship test material because the country seems to not do well with the test other than at the time people are actually taking the test, then my opinion would be "no". There may be a good reason to include the material in the MB, but this "1 in 3" survey isn't a good reason, if you ask me.
    • Well ... I actually didn't look in the tents to see how cots were arranged.  When I camped in similarly sized tents at a youth conference "just a few" years ago, we guys+1 counselor were put in similarly sized tents with next to no space between cots. The counselor was on the top of a double bunk. So, maybe my estimate was based on a warped sense of history. The GS tents also had electric outlets and a light. Sadly, I think the one camp in particular was sold in the recent consolidations.
    • Hi @Eagledad, At least you weren't up against GSUSA's current vision for scouting.   "Civic action" is the current push, there:  https://www.girlscouts.org/en/about-girl-scouts/girl-scouts-and-civic-engagement/forgirls.html    Goes right along with their current "Journeys" program. My reaction to the Aims and Methods of BSA, when I first encourtered them,  was that that was the first time I had seen that all so neatly set out and carefully thought through.  Many of those ideas do go right back (in some form) to the early days of scouting and are (historically at least) present in other branches of scouting.  (Citizenship?  yup.   Outdoors?  yup.  Patrols?  yup.   GSUSA had them, at least at one time.) But the one of the  BSA Methods that I still feel that I don't have a good understanding of is "Personal Growth".   I am still a little fuzzy on what falls under this concept (as opposed to under some of the other methods).   So, Barry,  now that you have mentioned "personal growth",  how would you define this or explain this?   How did you use this method with your scouts?  
    • Because the lawyers and bean-counters don't trust anybody.  Scouts included.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×