Jump to content

Scoutmaster Minutes

Inspirational stories and meaningful remarks to share


221 topics in this forum

    • 1 reply
    • 1.9k views
  1. Within my power

    • 3 replies
    • 1.8k views
  2. Prepared ...

    • 4 replies
    • 1.8k views
  3. To be that Brother

    • 1 reply
    • 1.8k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.8k views
  4. Scriptural Foundation

    • 7 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.8k views
  5. Commitment

    • 5 replies
    • 1.8k views
  6. The Man in the Glass

    • 2 replies
    • 1.8k views
  7. Patrol Pride

    • 1 reply
    • 1.8k views
  8. The Wolf you Feed

    • 2 replies
    • 1.8k views
  9. Shades of gray

    • 12 replies
    • 1.8k views
  10. Paycheck or payback? You decide.

    • 0 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 8 replies
    • 1.8k views
  11. Resources

    • 0 replies
    • 1.7k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • Everyone here uses the normalcy of family, schools and churches as a justification to normalize scouting. Scouting was always intended to be different to give ethical and moral growth a chance for males. Nobody today wants to admit males and females are different and different programs give both genders the chance for the best growth. A scout is brave is the first trait to go in this culture. Barry
    • Scouts Canada and Scouts UK, they are just called Scouts. Scouts BSA felt redundant to me anyway. I'm not concerned with a name change, nor any administrative hoopla fixes as to whether a girl unit is a troop or if it is just a patrol (or even if mixed patrols are allowed). I am concerned with long-term viability of program, and none of these changes to me are going to solve this. I'd love to share the optimism others are expressing here, but to be quite blunt, we heard all of that when girls were allowed to all programs, and what are the results? My council follows what national has directed, and that is to focus messaging on "positives", so the girl membership numbers are shared in comms but radio silence on the overall numbers. Yes, female youth numbers have had small increase each year for our council, but the male numbers have continued to drop. It's time for the organization, by whatever name they want to be known as, to stop reporting membership numbers on gender- the ship has sailed on this- and get back to talking turkey on the overall membership number. We aren't talking about breaking out the adult volunteer numbers between male and female, stop doing it with the youth already. 
    • Agreed; but that does not have to be lost with Coed or even with changes in views of normal human interactions.  We are only one of the players, and the family should be the number one, with schools and maybe churches  involved as well as families allow.
    • “Boy” Scouting has been a program of ethical and moral growth without the distraction of normal that compromises the growth that eventually contributes to the greater good of normal. Ethical and moral growth are a worthy sacrifice in today’s self centered search for importance.    Barry
    • My thoughts are how are they going to spend money they don't have to rebrand everything.  I expect dues to go up even higher next year.  Will the ring that goes around the World Scouting Crest, which currently says "Boy Scouts of America Since 1910", now say "Boy Scouts of America, from 1910 to 2025"?  Also, besides the obvious change to the Eagle rank patch, what about the Eagle medal that shows BSA across the Eagle?  What will Scouts BSA members now be called?  I hope and pray they don't use the SA abbreviation at all, as this has major ties to old Nazi party, who were often called brownshirts.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...