Jump to content

Venturing Program

Meet people from other Venture Crews and discuss program.


627 topics in this forum

  1. Powder Horn 1 2

    • 15 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 6 replies
    • 1k views
    • 8 replies
    • 882 views
    • 22 replies
    • 2.1k views
  2. "new" to Ventures program

    • 10 replies
    • 1.1k views
  3. One Pot Meals

    • 4 replies
    • 759 views
    • 15 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 3 replies
    • 763 views
  4. James West Fellowship

    • 3 replies
    • 771 views
    • 0 replies
    • 604 views
  5. VLSC 1 2

    • 15 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 17 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 63 replies
    • 5.2k views
  6. Venturing Uniforms 1 2

    • 17 replies
    • 1.6k views
  7. Venture Crew's Theme

    • 9 replies
    • 1k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • What a bureaucratic nightmare. This is a UMC specific Facilities Use Agreement and not the standard BSA one. Too bad they could negotiate updating the standard one that came out a couple of years ago.
    • Facilities Use Agreement is now posted as well. https://methodistscouter.org/a-new-agreement/ 
    • As I understand it now, an ASM reached out to the SE, concerned that I was being abused. The ASM was told everything was ok (not sure on what basis). I know my parents weren’t contacted because they were/are upset when they found this out. 
    • This helps me understand the tenor of the communications in the IVF I've mentioned several times. As I've gone over it 20 or so times, I can almost see people sneaking into the next guy up the chain's office with a sealed envelope in a lead box. "NO PUBLICITY" reads one page. "Quickly man, don't delay! Deliver the package to Mr. Ernst immediately! Do not kiss your wife or tell her where you're going. The Keeper of the Vault knows what to do. Speak to no one. Allow no one to read it. Be sure no one follows you. Your mission Jim, if you will accept it..."  
    • My early YP training as a rec league baseball coach AND as a CYO coach 20+ years ago had the same directives.  I challenged both orgs on it.  The explanation I received from both was about the same:  law enforcement would only act if there was clear evidence of a crime.  Which jibes with one of my earlier posts about the limitations of a law enforcement approach.  In addition, the authorities wouldn't reach back to the organizations, especially if they didn't investigate or didn't find any criminal activity.  That left the orgs in a tough place without vital information:  someone that's a jerk but not quite a criminal shouldn't be a coach or a scout leader  So this was likely not so sinister, just best, or at least common, practices for a while in the earlier days of widespread formal YPT.  I gave feedback to both orgs that it should be both not either/or.  Within a couple years the directives had changed, even before volunteers were designated mandatory reporters.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...