Uniforms
For All messages dealing with Scout Uniforms
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 10 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 26 replies
- 14.7k views
-
- 10 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 8 replies
- 4.9k views
-
- 13 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 11 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 5 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.8k views
-
- 17 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 4 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 40 replies
- 19.5k views
-
- 22 replies
- 11k views
-
- 96 replies
- 34.6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.9k views
-
"There is no Class A" isn't a helpful statement most of the time, and people should stop posting it. 1 2 3 4 5
- 61 replies
- 15.1k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
-
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
I can confirm those are numbers in the system for end of March 2025 and 2026. Those are the total unit based, and do not include LFL. -
My friend sent me the end of March numbers 2026. 767394 2025 949373 i don’t know if those numbers include LFL -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
I posted system numbers on 01 Apr. They have changed slightly: Total Current Youth on 01 Apr was 782,466 (this includes LFL): 18 Apr number is 792,273. ( +9807, or + 1.25%) Total Current Unit-Based Youth on 01 Apr was 749,343 (this is Crews, Posts, Ships, Troops, & Packs): 18 Apr is 756,627 (+7284, or + 0.97%) End of 2025 Total Unit-Based reported on 01 Apr was 877,399 (Total including LFL 907,946), number remains same So that means, from end of Dec 2025 to now, the total unit-based drop is 120,772 or a 13.76% loss Sorry, my 01 Apr calculation was wrong... I had subtracted current unit-based from previous total youth... should have worked with numbers in the same column. My error on 01 Apr painted a rosier picture than reality. -
You don't mean that spending almost $1,000,000,000 (yes BILLION) dollars on a property / facility that really has no purpose, did not meet an unfilled need, and has no road to profitability may have a negative impact on the organization that dumped all that money into it?? I am shocked.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)