yknot

Bikes have been a hot commodity during Covid. There was a time last year when bikes simply could not be found around here. Some parts are still hard to get and there is a market for them. A guess a good wake up call for anyone else with bikes.

I don't know why people are even putting feeders out now. It's bear season. Another way BSA is so out of touch with current practices. They really need to pad out their advisory boards to include people outside of scouting from Audubon, Cornell, Sierra Club, etc.

I remember this same discussion about increasing fees through 2022. It was discussed in several places. Was not aware BSA tried to hide it.

The scouter code of conduct clearly states you will not engage in harassment and nowhere does it specify or infer that is limited to youth. Nowhere in that document does it state that the harassment, or any other conduct requirements such as possession of alcohol or political or social advocacy, has to be observed by youth to be reportable.

I think it's going to be next to impossible to maintain program momentum and do any meaningful recruitment with numbers like this. Trying to recruit new Tiger leaders is tough without a lot of support. I also don't think things are going to magically rebound when (if) Covid is gone. Covid is not the only reason numbers have been declining although it's certainly been the most impactful.

Thank you. Just to make sure I'm reading this right, total membership in 2021 is now approximately 750,000? That's shocking but in line with what I was hearing would happen once the grace period ended for late recharters.

Do you have true March 2021 post recharter total numbers that would be an update of the December 2020 numbers? I've been looking for that.

Again, really? You're going to focus on a few uniforms and books in light of the glacial disaster that is BSA?

Okayyyy... but there is more than dollars at stake here. A lot more. We have a vanishing percentage of Americans involved in scouting. These folks are our friends, members, advocates and ambassadors. I wouldn't cut anyone loose who is in the scouting fold right now. Whatever thousands they are costing it is a drop in the bucket compared to the billions being discussed in this bankruptcy. I feel like we need to focus on the relevant stuff here.

I agree with focusing on the key problems. However, throughout this whole sorry process, there has been so much deflection of blame and responsibility to things that really aren't all that relevant to the bigger issues at hand. I hardly see how Venturing or Explorers or Sea Scouts have any significant bearing on what is happening to scouting.

If it's a tiny portion of the program how is it even relevant in the middle of this massive mess. Spinning off these programs is hardly going to make a dent in any issues the BSA is facing right now.

How is this not a YP issue?

I have also wondered this. They couldn't possibly be this stupid. It's possible they might have some kind of back pocket plan.

Everyone has amazon boxes and packing junk at home right now, right? Tell them to bring boxes, bags, duct tape, whatever. Whoever creates the most amazing Recycling Creature wins a prize. However, if you can go outside, do something outside. Flashlights. Night hike. Talk about nocturnal animals. Even in cities you've got rats, raccoons and bats.

That's a pretty slick PR website and package. I wonder where the funding did come from? At least one of those people has connections to a Council with cases of concern and very significant assets to lose. Also it's a pretty common PR strategy when you can't speak for yourself to find a so called objective third party defender. It was something I thought they should have tried a couple of years ago when this all started to counter the firehose of bad publicity. However, my overall reaction is one of sadness. Whether it is genuinely just three sincere guys who love scouting and put their own money up to help, or some kind of behind the scenes proxy strategy, it seems too little, too late, and too vague. A petition with a million names would be nice, but of what possible real use could it be.

I meant anger more in general. It's a frequent comment that the COs should be held liable and not BSA. The model has been willfully dysfunctional, as you point out, for decades. This is known.

It is a huge problem but I don't understand the anger directed at COs. BSA through the Councils has a supervisory responsibility. If COs are dysfunctional, which many are, why are their charters routinely renewed? The answer is that BSA has always promoted membership and numbers over proper management. Many COs are legacy churches or community organizations. All they know is that some nice person from scouts comes to see them once a year so they can sign some paperwork, and BSA has had no interest in rocking the boat except in extreme situations.

Resist the temptation to eat one for breakfast. Their population has declined dramatically in the past few decades. You'll be able to tell your grandkids you heard them thanks to scouting.

If Scouting is true to its own character, there is a debt of honor to be paid to victims. It happened on our watch, whether that was 50 years ago or today. Either we all believe in the same moral code and we take care of our own, or we don't.. If we don't, then scouting truly is dead in my mind. Even if it survives in some other format in name, what it supposedly stood for will be, in terms of character, forever gone.

I love Norman Rockwell although for me the painter who rocked my world was Rembrandt. Rockwell traced most of his paintings from photographs; Rembrandt's were paintings from life that were so real, some of them look like photographs despite the fact they were painted in the 1600s. Amazing.

They are meaningless in that they are tactical aspects of what is an overall strategic problem: There are broad organizational reasons why BSA is in the situation it is in. You could find a way to "fix" those two problems and still continue to have abuse cases if overall structural issues that create those situations in the first place are not addressed. These structural issues have been discussed ad nauseum on this site for years so they are easy to find if you want examples.

Those points are meaningless in this context. At best, they can pointed to as excuses for YP failure. The claimants are looking for competency in YP as one of their demands for the BSA to go forward.

Part of the issue with YP is also that BSA has not been honest. In a letter to Congress it said it supported look back legislation but at the same time spent millions quietly lobbying to fight such legislation. In the same letter to Congress, it also claimed it had never allowed a known perpetrator to return to scouting but that claim later had to be recanted when it was found to be untrue. BSA has known it has had issues with predators almost since its inception and yet for many years it pretended such problems didn't exist and only acknowledged the ineligible volunteer files as a result of a lawsuit. Over the years BSA has claimed a lot of things about YP but that doesn't always reflect the reality.

Those situations aren't analogous with what we're talking about. Immunity from blame implies that some kind of fault has occurred. We're talking about child abuse. Immunity is irrelevant when it comes to its victims.

Thanks. I think if there is any idea here that abused kids were somehow to blame for their abuse and the adults and responsible organization weren't, there's not much that can be rationally discussed.