Summer Camp
All about planning and going to Summer Camp
817 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 29 replies
- 5.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 2k views
-
- 27 replies
- 5.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.5k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
The problem isn't necessarily salary bloat, it is that the resource has been mis-applied. To survive, scouting is going to have to devote more resources towards unit operations even as unit numbers decrease. That's because the bar is always being raised due to incidents and liability issues. One of the huge issues facing scouting is the degree to which it has always relied upon volunteers. Volunteers and volunteerism, though, are in general decline. Unlike other youth organizations and many nonprofits, scouting has never developed strategies to cope with this reality, largely because it requires re-engineering structure far beyond consolidating councils. Apart from not having the bodies, scouting also lacks reliable expertise. You can't train unpaid volunteers enough to be considered expert in some of these areas. The aforementioned Range and Target sports is one example. In the years ahead, that is an area where scouting is likely going to be forced to either contain those activities to places where it can provide professional level supervision, provide direct paid unit support, or contract with third party providers. -
I dont think we can cut enough salary bloat to save the camps; save some maybe, but there is going to be winners and losers. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
Lose the bloated jobs... save the camps. -
Correct. This is correct. The fundraising is supposed to go towards funding program and training; however, so much is being spent to just subsidize professional salaries. We absolutely have the technology to eliminate councils. We have to do a 360 analysis and realize that we could easily get rid of 100 or more councils.
-
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
We have the technology to eliminate most of what paid professionals at councils do now. And, I have been thinking about this a lot lately... what SHOULD council do for units, other than provide program opportunities that units cannot get (easily) on their own? Shooting sports (SORRY!! Range and Target Activities), higher level aquatics (sailing , kayaking, canoeing, rowing, lifesaving), and climbing.... You do not need swimming pools. (Although they are helpful.) But you do need a safe swimming hole You do not need dining halls. (I would submit these are actually detrimental to the skills needed for outdoorsmanship and campcraft .) Scouts should be cooking for themselves. You do not need hot showers. (Although they are nice.) Scouts should learn field hygiene and sanitation. You do not need flush toilets. (Although they are nice, too.) See above. I would admit that, due to the number of people you'd like to access your camp, that pit toilets would be a most helpful concession. And local laws may be prohibitive in many places... Heck, you do not even need running water. (But you do need a potable water source, which could include bringing your own.) You need a patch of decent ground or woods. Imagine how easy and cost effective this would be if we did not have all that infrastructure. A local council should have a good sized camp to provide access to the outdoors. It really isn't that difficult to live under canvas for a week. When BP said "A week of camp life is worth six months of theoretical teaching in the meeting room" he was not talking about the monster of summer camp merit badge mills we have created across the country.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)