Uniforms
For All messages dealing with Scout Uniforms
1716 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 2.2k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 18 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 16 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 37 replies
- 8.3k views
-
- 14 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 2k views
-
- 13 replies
- 4.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 13 replies
- 3k views
-
- 19 replies
- 4k views
-
- 10 replies
- 2.2k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
Heard second hand that a member of the national executive committee was at a council leadership summit and told people that the membership for scouts from military families was something they had already been working on and that there were large donors lined up to cover the costs. If accurate this should actually help with overall membership numbers, as I am sure there are a lot of kids out there who would like to join but the program is out of reach on a military salary. -
I guess that all depends on where you are located. The goal here is for each of our districts to add at least one new unit each quarter, with an emphasis on every current charter having both a pack and troop. We are also putting an emphasis on contacting every family who had someone not renew their membership, find out what caused them to leave, and see what we might be able to do to bring them back into the program. If units, districts, and councils continue to just look at declining numbers and not look at why they are declining and work to mitigate those reasons, the decline will continue.
-
Some minor good news, sort of. Received email from Trust that they tried to send me a modest wire today, but it was rejected because of who knows what at the bank. Will call them tomorrow. But something is moving. -
Add those numbers to the loss of formality paying military members, and the shortfall gets worse. Looks like we are in a death spiral: fewer members lead to higher dues, which lead to more member losses. We will likely follow the Girl Scout lead, with maga-sized councils and less council contact. Single units covering large areas -
The 650,000 was a membership snapshot number posted on Scouting Forums before they closed it to general discussions. It wasn't from NAM. The NAM reports use annual numbers which for multiple years during and post Covid were artificially inflated for a variety of reasons.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)