New to the Forum?
Tell us a bit about yourself so we can welcome you to the Virtual Roundtable
1243 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 996 views
-
- 2 replies
- 921 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 850 views
-
- 1 reply
- 912 views
-
- 3 replies
- 824 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.4k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
-
That's not a universal view. Many consider it proof that scouting's unique problem with men preying on boys was already so well known and documented after only 25 years that it was publicly acknowledged by no less than the son of a President on a national stage. The article is proof of how early the problem was known, how long it was allowed to fester, and how little BSA effectively did about it over the ensuing decades. I've seen this article cited multiple times throughout the bankruptcy process as proof BSA has known it had a unique problem for almost its entire history. -
At that time that was probably as good as any other youth programs were or could do. Of course it is and will always be less than perfect. -
By johnsch322 · Posted
That is a far cry from saying we have files on men who have committed perverted sex acts upon young boys while engaging in the business of the Boy Scouts of America. -
Simply proof that the IV files were known early on, and that they were not covering them up. The bankruptcy and lawsuits are interrelated. Not news of course.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)