Jump to content

Working with Kids

Counseling, inspiring and teaching kids.


832 topics in this forum

    • 14 replies
    • 2.8k views
  1. JLTC

    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 11 replies
    • 2.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 6 replies
    • 4k views
  2. Who Can

    • 1 reply
    • 2.1k views
  3. troop transfer

    • 7 replies
    • 3.1k views
    • 28 replies
    • 5.9k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 3 replies
    • 2.5k views
  4. Unexpected rewards

    • 1 reply
    • 2k views
  5. Fun or not fun

    • 4 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 13 replies
    • 3k views
  6. eagle

    • 2 replies
    • 2.2k views
  7. Who's responsible? 1 2

    • 20 replies
    • 5.4k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • What position? Like a bill to reduce DoD's budget by the amount they would no longer spend to help secure jamborees or feed scouts evacuated from a hurricane?
    • Happy thanksgiving everyone. Generally, a scout who is belligerent to other scouts or not willing to talk to the committee would require the board to be suspended, written instructions given about what needs to change in some reasonable time frame (e.g., within a month, during the next campout). The board could then reconvene and determine if the youth's behavior was scout-like or if the youth was more willing to discuss troop life with these adults. I dealt with a "failure to bowline" once when I was a crew advisor when a scout failed to complete a Life BoR in his troop. The committee had not given him in writing how to remedy the situation. But, they did say that he could come back next week and demonstrate this skill. This was distressing to the scout who felt blind-sided by the challenge. Because he was in my crew, I laid out three options. He could comply and demonstrate the skill. I could discuss with the committee about how they might have been out of bounds. He could continue the rest of his advancement with me and the crew committee. He chose the first option. It turned out that the chairman of that board approached me about the situation. He was an Eagle Scout and knew very well that he didn't go by the book. But, he was frustrated that a number of scouts weren't keeping their skills up. He was just trying to turn it around. It didn't sound like he wanted every BoR to be a test. I opted to just listen (for once) and not play G2A wonk on the guy. It seemed like his heart was in the right place, and I'd rather have an adult like that than someone who quotes chapter and verse inflexibly.
    • We sent out an invite to all 60. The 3 showed up because they were interested. It really was as simple as that. 
    • Not much meat here except a personal comment. Is the scouting caucus going to actually level a position on this? 
    • Great observation, how do you propose to resolve the situation?  Can you share what the reason was for the 3 to show up? 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...