Jump to content

Patch Trading Central

Have a patch or memorabilia you're looking to swap? Use this virtual patch trading blanket. (This area is intended to facilitate memorabilia swapping, not necessarily commerce.)


383 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1k views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 4.3k views
    • 2 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 0 replies
    • 864 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 2 replies
    • 832 views
  1. Looking for

    • 6 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.8k views
  2. lets trade

    • 2 replies
    • 1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 927 views
    • 7 replies
    • 1.1k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • BSA mentioned this, which is why they added girls but kept girls in their own den and Troop.  The idea was that it would prevent any loss of boys while also adding girls.  Clearly that strategy didn't work, which is likely one reason why they are adding fully coed options.  No point in keeping them separated if it didn't keep scouts/scouters from quitting and many packs/Troops operated like coed units anyway.
    • I gave up referencing myself a while ago, so I won’t link to the thread that shows this data, but here goes anyway … while BSA was mulling over including girls in packs and troops (under the corporate double-speak “family scouting”), there was a WOSM census that revealed that membership declined in nearly every European country immediately after their scouting organization incorporated girls. Recovery to where they would have the same number of boys as they did before desegregation would take decades, if it has occurred yet at all. The UK took 25 years. So, if BSA is indeed about serving more youth, the strategy chosen is a very long term one — quite an anomaly for any American organization.
    • Just curious..did the BSA do any risk analysis on any of these decisions?    Or did they ask 3 people at the food truck and 2 said yes so they plowed ahead?     
    • Gays had very little influence one way or the other on membership until National decided to allow gays. That caused the exodus in numbers as well as as alumni funds. And that was the beginning of raising membership fees. Forcing scouting out of schools was done by the atheist. Non of the progressive activism really affected membership except for the girls. What really hurt the BSA the most was the financial support from past members. While liberal corporations taking away their support got all the media attention, it was the huge alumni pockets that hurt the most as National tried to walk the political tightrope. Barry
    • When we hear BSA plans to simplify the program (for Scouts), is the fear moving it back to 1972 and skill awards?
  • Who's Online (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...