scoutldr

Lots of new faces around the campfire, so I thought I'd bump this up again.

I assume "SR906" means you are Wood Badge trained? Some things about your statements are puzzling to me. Walking outside alone with a scout is a violation of Youth Protection guidelines. NEVER be one:one with a scout. I'm hoping I misread that. As was stated earlier, your unit committee needs to get a handle on the budgeting process. Using the PLC and SM's planning input, the committee should develop a budget for carrying out the annual plan. Estimate expenses, including registration, insurance, activities, awards, software,...everything. Then develop a plan for raising the funds within BSA guidelines for fundraising. In our unit, the "scout accounts" are for the individual scout's use...never for general expenses such as awards and equipment. Those who do not participate simply do not have an account to draw from, but unit awards and equipment should be covered by the annual dues. Some units are so successful with fundraising that the scout NEVER has to pay for anything, including uniforms. My units have not been that lucky. The PLC needs to also understand that, if fundraising is not as successful as necessary, then the plan may have to be adjusted as the year goes on. One thing I would NEVER do is dip into the scout accounts to cover operating expenses, because the adults failed to plan properly. Also, the issue of ice and water at camp. That has happened in my unit as well...what usually happens is that the leader who makes the decision to buy also pays for it...and more often than not the other leaders in attendance will chip in. We never ask the scouts or parents. The issue of "no women on campouts" also bothers me. Boy Scouts is not like Cub Scouts in that camping is a unit activity rather than a family activity. The number of "leaders" who attend should be the minimum necessary, whether male or female. Minimum is two. Depending on the size of the unit, more may be necessary, but having everyone's mom and dad attend with Scout is not necessary nor encouraged. Nothing wrong with having a "family campout" once a year, but it should not be the norm. Forgive me if I have misinterpreted anything.

I understand this is a serious question, Lisa, and am not intending to fan the flames. I just reread the BSA policy written here: http://www.bsalegal.org/duty-to-god-cases-224.asp Any of us who says they've never questioned their faith is probably not being honest. I, myself have periods of agnosticism when I see things and wonder "what kind of loving God would allow this to happen". Then, other times, I look at the wonders of science and nature and wonder, "how could this have happened randomly and without divine guidance?" Raised in the ELCA (but that's another thread), I earned Eagle and the Pro Deo Et Patria (God and Country) award, and was baptized, confirmed, substitute organist, acolyte and finally President of the Congregation Council for two terms. But subsequent issues in my life have led me to question blind faith. When I see those who profess to be men of God committing child abuse. WHen I see those who swear that God (Allah) requires them to murder others. I have to question. Questioning is healthy, I think. Thomas questioned. As someone pointed out, even Jesus questioned on the cross. As I get older, those who make the most sense to me are the evangelicals on the radio on Sunday morning who point out that there are no "denominations" in the Bible...there is no need to filter or interpret the Word and create "manmade rules" to guide your faith. Being "unchurched" does not equal "unfaithful". One of my ASM's is unchurched, although his wife and son are Catholic. I once gave him a copy of "The Gospel of the Redman" and inscribed it "to one of my most religious friends". In my mind, how one lives and treats others (and Nature) is more important that dressing up and sitting in church every Sunday. Sorry for rambling. The BSA policy is only as strict as its enforcement at the unit level. Everyone knows my position and no one yet has stripped me of my membership card. I have good friends who are gay. I wish that they could also experience Scouting. But I put up with the BSA policy because the boys I do reach are better off, I hope. I expect that the BSA will change its policy over time, as it has toward blacks and women. Is it better for the boy to kick him out, or to continue to expose him to the wonders of Creation and hope he finds his way one day? It's up to the unit.

I must have missed the memo that said "Scouts who utter the "a"word(s) must be banished." If the Scout is a teenager, presumably he can read. Give him a copy of the DRP and offer to discuss its meaning with him. Then see if he re-registers.

Not to mention the "feat" of finding registered MBC for every badge.

As a youth and today, all adults were called "Mr. Lastname". (Or Ms, as appropriate). My adult sons (31 and 27) still call their former leaders "Mr. Lastname". Some parents, when talking to their kids, call me "Mr. Firstname"...as though putting "Mr" in front somehow adds respect, while calling my by my firstname. I do not agree.

1. Eagle patch/knot 2. 50 Miler award (if you knew me when I was a fat bookworm kid, you'd understand) 3. First mile swim, earned in the James river, swimming upstream behind a wooden rowboat (see 2. above) 4. BSA Lifeguard (ditto)-earned in the days of hand-to-hand combat against an active "victim" twice your size Just curious, GreenUniform, how can you spend 10 years in Varsity as a youth? (adults wear the blue background)

"Canadians better hope we don't get a government-run plan, or their back-up plan across the border will cease to exist. They'll have to get in line behind the rest of us." No...they won't be allowed in the line at all. That's what I was told when I recently traveled to Canada. "Do not go to the Doctor, you will NOT be seen. If you need to go to the ER, you will have to pay IN FULL, in cash, in advance."

"When I CHOOSE to make a contribution that's fine, when they take it from me, that's no longer a contribution and either illegal OR unethical OR both." Hmmm...sounds like "wealth redistribution" to me... Probably what happened is that they are covering their butts...there is probably a COuncil policy that they do NOT pay sales tax. But the person who sent you on the errand neglected to tell you that. So, rather than get in trouble with the SE, they are sticking it to you. I agree with the others...if and when you send in your FOS check, deduct that amount...and include a letter explaining why.

Concur with what BS said. If he really wants to work with the boys, encourage him to sign up (with the District) and make himself available to ALL troops. You and your committee have no say in that process. The converse of that is, if you have MBC who are NOT registered with the district, then they are "illegitimate". One of my pet peeves is our entire District MBC list is almost ALL "Troop XX only". So now if a troop wants their scouts to earn MB, they have to get their own counselors too.

As one who deals in federal regulations every day...I will wait with baited breath to see the "regulations" that come out as a result of HR 3200, if passed into law. For example, the OSHA Act of 1970 is relatively short and nebulous...if an OSHA compliance officer cannot find a regulation specific to what he thinks is wrong, he can cite the "General Duty Clause", section 5(a)(1) of the Act..."employers shall furnish a workplace that is free of recognized hazards". But the "regulations", published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) give details such as: "Each end of a platform 10 feet or less in length shall not extend over its support more than 12 inches (30 cm) unless the platform is designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees and/or materials without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end." and: "Reductions from nominal diameter of more than one-sixty-fourth inch for diameters up to and including five-sixteenths inch, one-thirty-second inch for diameters three-eighths inch to and including one-half inch, three-sixty-fourths inch for diameters nine-sixteenths inch to and including three-fourths inch, one-sixteenth inch for diameters seven-eighths inch to 1 1/8 inches inclusive, three-thirty-seconds inch for diameters 1 1/4 to 1 1/2 inches inclusive;" So...even if the "Healtcare Reform Act" is passed, it will mean nothing until we see the regulatory details. They will probably even specify what color and diameter your Viagra needs to be to meet govt specifications.

Excited me is.

After having to watch both my parents die in 1995 (mom from diabetes, and dad from lung and colon cancer), I made the decision that, if faced with a "terminal" prognosis, I would want no extraordinary measures taken to gain a few extra months of "life", filled with pain, emotional suffering, or a morphine-induced stupor. After my FIL died of kidney cancer in 2000, and now watching my MIL struggle for every breath (COPD) as she continues to fight for every minute of life she can grab, regardless of expense or emotional toll on loved ones, my decision is even more entrenched. I do not plan to be selfish and continue living artificially. When God wants me, He can have me. Death is hard on your loved ones, but prolonged dying is even worse.

I had diverticulitis surgery last year...an abdominal CT with contrast was billed at $1500. And every time I had one, I got charged for two views..."abdominal" and "pelvic", or $3000. My co-pay with Blue Cross/Blue Shield was 10% or $300. During the 3 month ordeal, I was on the CT table 4 times...or $6000 ($600 out of pocket). Not sure what the hospital accepted as payment, but it wasn't nearly what they billed. I'd have to go back and check my statements. Was it worth it? Well, I'm alive and feeling good, and it didn't bankrupt me. I pay nearly $400 a month in premiums.

SOunds good to me. It's really up to the discretion of the SM as to what he/she will accept (within reason, of course).

Are you sure that's not just the old ODL design? They've always been available in poly/wool. Looks like it to me.

Unit "tenure" is listed on your charter roster printout at the top (in months). Be aware that if there was ever a lapse in the charter, the clock starts over. If in doubt, a phone call to your Council registrar should answer the question.

Silo, wilkum! (Is that correct?) Your English is perfect!

With all due respect, state laws must be different. When my wife, the school nurse, takes a sick day and a sub cannot be found (a frequent occurrence), the office staff dispenses the meds. It's apparently legal in this state.

Welcome. counsellor. Interesting handle. This topic has been discussed here ad nauseam...just do a search on "meds" or "medication". Sounds like your camp has pushed the responsibility back to the units. In our camp, ALL medications, youth and adult, are to be turned in to the camp medical person during check-in, and must be in their original containers with name and dosage thereon. In recent years, they even required a SEPARATE permission slip for EACH dose, signed by the parent. The unit leader's responsibility is to ensure the scout reports to medical for each dose. NO medications were to be kept by the scout or the unit, except for rescue inhalers or epi-pens. My wife is a school nurse, and her day used to be nothing but handing out doses of Ritalin. With the new long-acting drugs, it's not as much as a problem, since they only take one dose before coming to school. Our previous discussions here drew the consensus that it's up to you to choose whether to accept the responsibility or not. You are certainly under no obligation. If the behavior of the scout is not acceptable, then address it accordingly without regard to medications. I hate it when ADD/ADHD is used as an excuse to get away with bad behavior.(This message has been edited by scoutldr)

"So, how long have you been in Scouting?" Just look at my yellow, green, red and blue Service Stars!

If "the hat" (or any official hat) is an official uniform item, why would it not be "approved" for WB21, and who is empowered at the council level to decide that an official uniform item may not be worn? Sheesh. Another reason not to sign up.

Donating your own money to help others is charitable. Confiscating MY money to give to others is thievery. I am quite capable of being charitable, as my tax return shows.

My only objection is to knots that can be had by stroking a check. I refuse to buy one of those. Those who put in hundreds hours working with boys or contrbute dollars at the unit level are equally, if not more, deserving of recognition. But miss a few roundtables and "no knot for you!"

I wouldn't call 35% a "mandate for change", even if it is "up" from before. That means that 65% think we are NOT going in the right direction. That's the context.