Jump to content

Summer Camp

All about planning and going to Summer Camp


815 topics in this forum

    • 7 replies
    • 12.6k views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 2.2k views
    • 5 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 1.5k views
    • 8 replies
    • 6.9k views
    • 30 replies
    • 10.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 3 replies
    • 4.7k views
    • 22 replies
    • 7.6k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 18 replies
    • 6.6k views
    • 64 replies
    • 24.6k views
    • 42 replies
    • 11.7k views
    • 0 replies
    • 2.1k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • I would rather a troop not have a "meeting" if they are doing a different activity that week. Meetings are there to support the program; most of the program exists (or should) outside of those meetings. IMO Scouting has dropped off b/c there is too much focus on the meetings, and classroom stuff and not enough in the out of outdoors. When scouting is too much like school with some weekend field-trips then it isn't scouting. Retention and engagement metrics in an adult-led, classroom style program is bad data.
    • Concur with your assessment.  My extended guess... National wants to move more rapidly with consolidation of councils, and this will prepare the way...
    • So with your free time, and your buddies free time, it sounds like the perfect seed to start a takeover of the troop. 
    • Every time I have seen a structured removal of voting ability or removal of input ability it was caused by the ruling bodies desire to remove or reduce dissent to a pending action. I've seen this in other non-profits and in local governments. This type of action always preceded a controversial policy change.  I wonder if this is the fallout of the Nassau and Norfolk councils voting to not merge and then being forced to after all of Long Island scouting went bankrupt? There are a lot of councils just digging in and refusing to be part of the team right now. Is this a mechanism to remove the dissent at the various localish levels? 
    • That's not what any of the numbers state, it's not what I see, it's not what national reports as seeing, we're at 25% of peak headcount and it's a known fact that lack of meeting = lack of engagement = program decline. Open any of the guides, the cub scout guides, the troop leader guides, the committee guides; national tells us in every publication that meeting as much as possible, weekly, is the optimal method and that not meeting like this causes a negative affect on retention. 
×
×
  • Create New...