Patch Trading Central
Have a patch or memorabilia you're looking to swap? Use this virtual patch trading blanket. (This area is intended to facilitate memorabilia swapping, not necessarily commerce.)
376 topics in this forum
-
- 10 replies
- 906 views
-
- 0 replies
- 408 views
-
- 2 replies
- 379 views
-
- 0 replies
- 359 views
-
- 2 replies
- 376 views
-
- 0 replies
- 362 views
-
- 1 reply
- 364 views
-
- 2 replies
- 383 views
-
- 3 replies
- 393 views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 370 views
-
- 0 replies
- 453 views
-
- 1 reply
- 570 views
-
- 1 reply
- 504 views
-
- 0 replies
- 483 views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
So the scoutmaster says he found through research that he can decide if an event should be considered for service as a scoutmaster. This is an Eagle Scout Ceremony for scouts in our troop. I'm not understanding why they should be bribed to volunteer to help out if first they are asked and second they are doing a good turn by participating and how do you count the time spent. Secondly, our district advancement says "Service cannot be for the benefit of the Scouting Organization. Defeats the purpose of “Service”. " So if you are saying "It is troop/unit service" that it be documented as such? -
Incorrect. I did not ask for inside information to scuttle off to someone of influence working on behalf of abuse survivors. If you took it that way, I apologize for being unclear. I was wondering if you men have an interface that would allow a channel to relay some of the good and common sense suggestions I've heard articulated here. I am not a power player in this case. Far from it. I have thoughts, a voice and, eventually, one vote among tens of thousands. I don't influence a group of claimants, a single claimant or state attorney, or any member in a position of leverage. This what I wrote: "Is anyone here connected in a meaningful way to a member of the Ad Hoc Committee? I am curious if they have any real influence and if I am correct in my assertion that many LC’s consider themselves beyond the reach of its representation and influence. I know some do, but not the degree to which, how divided the group is, and etc." -
By vol_scouter · Posted
You requested information about the unanimity of the decision that could be of help to the plaintiff's attorney's. Hopefully, everyone sees this. -
I disagree. Jeff Anderson has already shown he is willing to battle an Archdiocese for 4 years over $55M. LCs have billions. It will take a large settlement offer (or National BSA liquidation) to avoid 3-4 more years of litigation. -
Actually, he's purportedly or ostensibly representing your Council and all the others, as the Chairman of the AHC. If you want to remain beyond reproach, avoid all possible appearance of conflicted interest. Take it as you like. As I said, I was pointing out something that may be of interest. To me, whether as a claimant, attorney, spectator or person interested in the future of Scouting, it's worth noting. Perhaps he was the one and only option to chair the AHC and be the lead negotiator in contexts that include the major creditors. Again, what do I know...
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)