Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
eisely

Save the Sea Kittens!!!!

Recommended Posts

I wonder if the PETA people think it's OK for carnivores (lions, etc.) to be snacking on wildebeests?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, the horrific screams coming from the kitchen are deafening!!!

The wife just threw celery, parsley and fennel in the pot. I'm pretty sure she had already put the chicken out of it's misery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

evmori said "I wonder if the PETA people think it's OK for carnivores (lions, etc.) to be snacking on wildebeests?"

 

It would be amusing to watch them try to stop them.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PETA strikes again. This morning, on the way home from work, NPR had an item about Old George, the 20+ lb lobster in the NYC restaurant. The owners allowed PETA to return Old George to the sea, because he was somewhere between 100-150 years old.

 

Pack, we missed some nice aged lobstah that could have fed you, Gonzo myeslf and the families for a nice dinner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's OK. I have known older prey to be tough and stringy. As with the rest of the animal world, I'd rather eat the young. Yum!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if PETA is worried about sea sponges, too! Now we don't eat 'em but boy are they great for washing your car!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gern,

Not a law, but campstaff skits???

Anyway, Pack, some of the others, and I like belonging to PETA (People Eating Tasty Animals). Just because it has the same acronym as the other, doesn't mean we are making fun of them,. Well maybe. Heck, definitely, but all in jest. I wonder how Langley feels about CIA (Central Insurance Agency), CIA (Culinary Institue of America), etc. I'm sure they privately behind the backs of the others, make fun in jest.

 

I'll take a peek into some of the other Bush/Obama bashing, and other making fun of threads to see if the same question has been posted there.

 

Let those without sin (earth based, Christain, Jewish Muslim, etc) cast the first stone. I'm now ducking for cover from those first cast stones now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I think Gern is trying to remind us to be careful about making insensitive statements toward people who hold very devout and personal beliefs. And, assuming I'm correct in that assertion, I get the point. His comment would apply equally, say, to remarks about the ideas of people who believe in geocentrism, or a flat earth, or creationism, faith healing, or name-a-religion. And I plead guilty when those beliefs directly affect my actions and goals, especially if such things are pushed in the legal arena.

When confronted with non-rational arguments, rational counter arguments don't work well. Satire and ridicule make the point much more effectively. This is the essence of employing reductio ad absurdum to their arguments and the beauty of the approach is that by confronting them with logical extremes, THEIR arguments are the ones that seem absurd as a result. Their hurt feelings should be an indication to THEM that they need to re-examine THEIR ideas.

 

In this case the idea that we should be humane (this is a mercurial concept in itself) to other creatures has been taken by PETA (the 'real' PETA) to extreme, and IMHO, superficial and idiotic ends. I doubt that many of the PETA members actually understand the philosophical threads that have led to these positions. At least I have met quite a few who don't. And I tend to ridicule them. Same as the snake handlers, faith healers, creationists, geocentrists, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly Pack.

I guess liberal values are OK to mock, but conservative values are off limits. I've seen it repeated over and over here. Just can't see how those who claim to follow the scout law justify that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't classify PETA among those with liberal values. Kooky & totally ridiculous values, yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×