Jump to content

Scouting History

Share and celebrate the history of the world's largest youth Movement


532 topics in this forum

    • 2 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 5 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
  1. Troop #1260

    • 3 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 8 replies
    • 3.5k views
  2. Some Girl Scout history

    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 6 replies
    • 2.1k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • @Armymutt To answer your question directly, my personal NSHO is that if it was a requirement for a previous rank you still need to know it going forward. Other the intuitive sense that this should be so when it comes to skills, if scouts could forget how to pitch a tent, knots, cook at camp, pack a pack, etc it would make high adventure dangerous. The whole enterprise requires building and adding skills to the ones you've already got. It's like math, you never get to forget the commutative property or multiplication tables just because you're more "advanced". Part of "more advanced" is having the basics completely down.
    • It is easy to lie, cheat, and steal your way to Eagle Scout... I have seen many a "Paper Eagle Scout" over the years.  It has literally become akin to "pay your fee, get your degree."  If you keep your membership up, attend a few summer camps where you sit around a picnic table and listen to a 15 year old talk about a merit badge, and have your parents do your project, you, too, can be given an Eagle Scout rank patch. When these come to me for assistance, I hold to the requirements.  Nothing more, and nothing less.  I do not sign requirements if I believe the Scout has not done them as written, and have had some parents be quite upset with me when I refuse to participate in helping them maintain the facade.  They have always found someone else with, let's say, a different standard of integrity, who will sign off stuff...   My stance is always that "I am only responsible for my own actions."  
    • Forgot to add, an entire district advancement committee, which denied the Scout his Eagle and gave him a plan to earn it properly, resigned in protest over National's decision to give it to him.
    • I can tell you it is extremely disheartening to other Scouts, especially special needs Scouts who are busting butt to meet requirements, to see someone who is unable to do basic skills, i.e. stuffing a sleeping bag, setting up a tent, etc,  wearing a Life Rank on their pocket. The folded troop's SM "don't understand the importance of camping." And whether the Scout is telling me just what he remembers the SM saying, or the SM actually abridging requirements,  but He says that SM told him all he needed to do foir XYZ MBs were one of the requirements. Family is pushing for Eagle and family is getting frustrated that we are showing requirements and giving workbooks. As for the Eagle Board, there is not much they can do. National will grant it and say something along the lines of "you do not penalize the Scout for the mistakes of the adult." 
    • One of the questions that comes to mind is, does a Scout have to know the Law and Oath after achieving the rank of Scout?  It's no longer a requirement for advancement.  We all take it for granted that a Scout would know the two things we say at the beginning of every meeting, but is it a requirement?  I suspect they are not doing BORS correctly.  My wife is a committee member, soon to be the Advancement Chair.  She said they don't have a discussion with the Scout not present.  Another problem is, they try to cram all the BORs into one hour.  Last night we had 4 for Tenderfoot and 1 for Second Class.  
×
×
  • Create New...