johnsch322

I hope the BSA doesn’t read this and think it would be a new way of raising money. Next they will come out and ask us to sign over whatever settlement checks we do get. Their pitch will be because they do so much good for so many people and how could we be so greedy LOL.

I want to make it clear that even if my valuation by the claims matrix was 2.7M I have not expected to receive that amount. I understand that this is a bankruptcy. But now for the BSA to put a lower valuation then they originally came up with feels like another violation of myself. It’s like let’s put salt in the wound.

In the settlement offer that I voted on the valuation of my claim was 2.7 million. That what the plan that was voted on. Now the voting is done the BSA is saying it is worth less. That is BS. I think the white man is speaking out of both sides of his mouth.

Those are good points but they are factors that have been known all along when this so called expert gave his first analysis. So what changed?

I fail to understand how all thru this settlement procedure claims were worth $XXXX according to the BSA and now they say claims are worth only $XXX. Can someone please explain this to me. And miraculously it fits right into how much is in the settlement offer.

It sure puts the "experts" credibility as an expert under question. This is my expert opinion unless I decide to change my mind. Kaching goes the cash register. How much is the BSA paying him?

The coalitions Good question and I am sure it will be brought up.

And that is why I would recommend everyone to understand the lifelong effects of being a child sexual abuse survivor entails. If research is done then most people might understand mine and multiple others position on the current settlement offer. A good place to start would be this topic: It goes right to the heart of why the BSA is in bankruptcy and that is because of the lifelong effects of the trauma of sexual abuse. If it did not have such an impact on ones life then yes 100K might be appropriate.

I think the biggest stink will come from the e-ballots. All the feedback from the survivors that received them said it was a disaster.

I am always amazed when I read stories such as Peters about how much I can relate. Not every detail not every word but there are constant themes that I can see that happened in my life. I know that you and I and other survivors have tried to paint a picture of what life has been like for us and I think it is a shame when sometimes we are relegated to the back of the room. I cannot expect a nonsurvivor to understand what we are constantly living with but here are two quotes from this article that I think pretty much sums it up. "Sexual victimization is a betrayal. It's a betrayal of our belief that the world is a just place and a betrayal of our trust in the people who are supposed to keep us safe. It's a betrayal of our own bodies." "Norman took something from me that was the most intense violation of my life: He took my ability to love," Peter said.

I read that and to me it appears once again the BSA wants to tarnish the TCC and downplay the amount of award that a survivor deserves.

I can understand your frustration. I have never seen a post that talked about the lifelong benefits of scouting, the joy of scouting or anything of that ilk that was posted in a bankruptcy topic removed and relegated to its own topic.

TK has his opinions and his reasons for stating them but is not retained by the TCC or part of the TCC's legal team. If the LC's, CO's and insurance company's are to be part of the bankruptcy I believe they are also part of victims must do as well in Chapter 11 as they would in Chapter 7. hence that is where the wording substantial contribution comes into play.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow6hTpV_y4g This was the latest one.

Because of my hectic work week I only just now watched the TCC's Town Hall from last week. I would recommend you take 20 minutes and watch it. I also recommend it for all those who are not survivors as it will gives good information about where the Bankruptcy is sitting, why, and what the next steps are.

More than ready to wait another year if it means getting an equitable settlement.

66% was mentioned but emphasis was placed on the 75% figure.

Only getting a handful of beans now under current plan.

I know that none of the nine are members of the are members of the firm working the case and have never heard that any of the nine are Lawyers.

My understanding is that 2% more accept voters will not make a difference. Maybe 22% but even then it may not get it thru the court system

The actual TCC is the nine members and just like they hired them they could fire them also.

It only supported the first RSA and only if the Hartford deal was not part of the settlement. They did not sign on to the last RSA.

I wonder if they are now referring to the TCC who they essentially have ignored for the past 6 months?

I wonder how the insurance companies are feeling this morning? The TCC has made it known they do not want the insurance companies to be part of the settlement unless they come up with a much more substantial offer. Tomorrows TCC Town Hall is going to be must see TV (Zoom).

TCC has withdrawn notice of deposition to Omni. Any thoughts? and now they want to depose the BSA.