Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Cburkhardt last won the day on January 27 2021

Cburkhardt had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

272 Excellent

About Cburkhardt

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    District of Columbia
  • Biography
    Scoutmaster of Scouts BSA Troop for Girls in District of Columbia. 37 Scouts, 9 Scoutmasters, 19-member Committee. AOL/Eagle/Quartermaster/Vigil as Scout. Past Positions: District Chairman, Area Venturing Advisor (Central), Council VP (Abraham Lincoln, Springfield IL), Region Membership Chair (Central), National Venturing Committee V Chair, National Second Century Society Chair, Area President (Central 8), National Income Development Chair, Council President (Pathway to Adventure, Chicago), National Advisory Council, Assistant Webelos Den Leader.

Recent Profile Visitors

2519 profile views
  1. There are three purple national committee-oriented patches. The National Executive Board (a huge group) has its purple patch worn by its members. Just under them is the equally large National Advisory Council, which has its own patch. It is mainly comprised of either former National Executive Board members who no longer want to fulfill executive board responsibilities or people who are being considered for National Executive Board membership or are being honored for distinguished service or financial contributions. Finally, if a Scouter is formally appointed to the national committee syste
  2. From your explanation, it seems clear that Bob is not adding value in delivering resources and constructive oversight from the CO. My prescription would be to have a senior Council volunteer officer meet with the executive officer of the CO (one is always identified on the Charter) and make a change. The unavoidable solutions are that either the CO steps-up and replaces Bob with one of the CO’s real members, or the Troop volunteers and CO sever the relationship and the Troop moves to a different CO. Trying to baby-around with the situation by working with Bob to accommodate his desires is g
  3. Family Scouting: As I have understood the BSA's use of the term "Family Scouting", it means operating a linked-Troop concept and not the idea of having non-Scouter family members going along on monthly campouts. Our all-girl Troop is a stand-alone unit and is therefore not "Family Scouting". I do not support non-Scouter family members attending monthly campouts and offer the following experience as support. For the last two years we experimented by celebrating the end of the program year with a combined May campout and Court of Honor at a nearby location. The families were invite
  4. Scoutmaster of 48-Girl Troop Responds Q: Does anyone have examples of successful new girl troops that are actually operating independently? A: In our Council, we have a number of unlinked girl Troops that are large, outstanding units. These Troops operate nearly identically to large, successful all-boy Troops. I am Scoutmaster of one of these. We have 48 girl members, 4 patrols a 9-person scoutmaster staff and an 18-person Troop Committee. The Troop is fully youth led. This summer we took 33 Scouts to our council summer camp and 14 to high adventure experiences. W
  5. Dear Moderators and Friends, Last year some of you may recall that I actively hosted three lengthy postings in advance of the bankruptcy filing. My purpose was to prepare the way for a great reorganization filing that I believed would result in a plan agreement and approval within six months or so after the filing date. The discussions were serious and hundreds participated. COVID destroyed that possibility, leading some claimants Attorneys to smell blood in the water. They have gone in for the kill and Scouting as we know it could end. Several commenters joined claimants attor
  6. Too many Americans have been staking out absolute positions and daring others to cross a rhetorical line. Sometimes the rhetoric on even this site has trended in a similar direction, with folks just not showing respect for reasoned but differing views. The divisions that evolve reduce our confidence in our nation's Constitution, and similarly in the fundamental approaches in Scouting. The WWII combat veterans who were the Scoutmasters and Skippers of my youth were not that way. They fought hard in a war to ease my way through life, and Boy Scouts and Sea Scouts helped make me what I hope i
  7. Inquisitive: The point is that eroding the confidence of BSA professionals and volunteers regarding the post-bankruptcy future of the BSA by continuing to pound negative PR well after the claims filing deadline has rationality for the claimant attorneys -- at least the ones that favor liquidation. If the core of the BSA were to lose faith in its long-term future, the Judge could take that into account in determining whether to approve a reorganization or order a liquidation.
  8. The future will largely be defined by the result of the private negotiations going on right now. Because it may be extraordinarily difficult to come to an agreement acceptable to all major parties, a principal determinant of BSA's future may be whether there can be a financial arrangement the Judge will deem acceptable to order as a cramdown. She is uniquely empowered to balance all of the factors commenters have posted to this string. She really has in her hands the discretion to make the call here. That is why bankruptcy judges are often thought of as one of the most powerful commercial
  9. Here is the answer to the question regarding whether BSA professionals/retirees would have an economic incentive to favor liquidation over reorganization. If the pension benefit guarantee fund were to take over the account, the longer-time and higher-paid employees will have their monthly payouts significantly reduced. Some of the monthly checks would get cut from the 15K-20K/ month range down to $5K/month. So they overwhelmingly favor reorganization. For lowest-paid or short-term employees there is not much of an issue.
  10. The claimant's attorneys want the largest possible amount placed into a Victims Trust Fund, so they have the economic motivation to file as many claims as possible and argue that, within the totality of claims filed, all are valid. The insurance companies want the lowest possible amount placed into the Victim's Trust Fund, so they have the economic motivation to uncover fraud and other facts that would diminish the value of the totality of claims filed. In a way, the BSA is somewhere in-between, because it wants to see justice done for victims via payments, but also wants to retain sufficien
  11. Remember, the current process is that all parties are trying to negotiate an overall dollar amount that goes into a large trust. The existence of fraud at this point is a factor that the trustee and judge take into account in determining the overall amount necessary to pay valid claims. If the trustee/judge conclude that a percentage of the claims are likely to be fraudulent, they will order a smaller amount to go into the trust. The insurance companies are just trying to lower the overall dollar amount of the trust at this point. If their allegations prove true, the amount to fund the tru
  12. Quick answer to CynicalScouter: I think a reasonable funding window could be 1-2 years. That is plenty of time to marshal assets and submit a trust contribution. Just my speculation though.
  13. Looks like the conversation is going in another direction, so I'll end my thoughts by simply sharing that I highly doubt a Victims Trust Fund would be funded by future national registration fees. This would be too unreliable a funding source in a bankruptcy negotiation. Registration fees might continue to increase for other reasons, but not to fund a trust. I remain supremely confident that the BSA will get through this for several reasons. We still have a great purpose and many great supporters. And, the nature of the bankruptcy reorganization will assist us do justice by providing r
  14. The potential method and formula for funding a BSA Victims Trust Fund is the subject of highly confidential discussions at this point, and anyone having that information should maintain the confidentiality of it. Anything I share here is not inside information, but just general bankruptcy information. The normal circumstance is to fund a trust of this particular nature within a reasonable time after a reorganization plan is ordered by the bankruptcy court. That's because we don't have near-guaranteed future consumer spending to rely on (like future proceeds from the purchasers of tobacc
  15. Very directly put, the claimants and their lawyers should want to see a BSA national and the councils to continue to exist so they can continue to pay into the pension plan. If national liquidates, the Guarantee Corporation attaches pretty much everything. I share this to encourage everyone that there are significant reasons why the claimants will want to agree to a reorganization plan.
  • Create New...