qwazse

Matt, you've just defined a venturing crew. Skiers led by the ski czar (a.k.a., activity chair for winter sport), rafters for the raft czar, college students by the spring-break czar, etc ... Participants team up with whoever's schedule they can synch with. Upside: flexibility. Downside: plenty of failure due to lack of unit cohesion.

Misread it at first and thought "Hmm knee jerkey ... next to the pickled pigs feet."

Stosh, same for my siblings. There was a time when I was post-bommer. Then Clinton started including '64 in that demographic. What a slam.

Sorry, didn't mean to harp on just that. I just wanted to say that the confidence to step forward as a unit leader is found in folks who are routinely volunteering in a way that they have practiced people skills, can see the need for what you are proposing, and are willing to step away from their current charity to take up this new mantle. Church was my example of the kind of charity that generates these sorts of leaders. Fire halls, veterans' posts, and service fraternities are another example. Rick has a point. The economy drives 30-somethings away from all of that. But the standard of living (and sometimes a negative view of organizations in general) also has these folks investing a lot of time in non-essentials.

One thing we try to do (partly because of duties elsewhere, partly to share the load) is rotate who goes to RT, with a couple going on any given evening. The advantage of this is that different ears pick up on different activities (of wheich there are many council-wide), so sometimes one attendee catches something that another one will miss.

Depends on the unit, I guess. Our district used to be a council before decades of mergers ... something to think about.

Nine boys, two adult leaders ... already double the average load for a wilderness area site. Use three sites. Split the patrol, four at one site, five at the other, adults at the next. Works for me. But how would the forest service even know that that's an "organized group"? More to the OP, when you talk your young adults about starting a unit, what is the picture in their head? Smiles on a half dozen kids faces? Or hours locked horns with adults (like maybe during their last board of review)? How many former SPL/JASM's actually had a seat on the troop committee to even know what one would be like? How many of them did you allow to hang with the adults after lights-out around the evening campfire while the old fogies pulled out their evening cigars? Meanwhile at church, capable teens are on the deacon's board. Collecting the offering. Counting change with the treasurer. Raising support for their mission(s). Taking the pulpit twice a year. One young fellow (former scout) ran for councilman at age 18. He told me that his political career has been the highlight of the past six years (over college, the work world, etc ...). He might have gained a sense of rights and responsibilities from those couple of years in his troop, but he learned to work the crowd, hand out leaflets, and canvass a neighborhood from many years ushering on Sunday mornings. Not saying every churchman is cub-master material. Just saying that the room full of Eagles is not the first place to look.

Yes, because most of our boys' projects are major contracts, and a little personal coaching from folks who do subcontracting work helps them to choose and plan effectively. Sometimes, they just need someone to help them schedule their next couple of moves. Son #1 and DiL just did this for Son #2. Well, not every boy has that older brother to help with that sort of thing. And the paperwork is ridiculous! Not every boy works well with it. So, if you've got a scouter who can help a boy see the forest for the trees -- especially if there are more than 1/2 dozen Life scouts clamoring to complete their projects in a year -- it's good that the boys know he's their go-to guy.

The pack was from the area. The "pack master" said he and his family went there regularly. Sounds like a lot of folks thought it would be no problem. They were were making the plans and didn't think that they should make that clear to the parents and boys. It's the CO's problem. Not the council's. We've all dealt with clueless parents. I remember once: "I'll help the boys make model rockets." DL:"Fine here's your budget." I get decent models under budget. Discuss assembly, A or B engines. Go over safety. 3, 2, 1, Launch. DL: "They're going so high, so fast!" "Um, didn't hear the part about launching rockets? And needing this big field?"

You all had your heart in the right place, but ... If this is about medical records for adults, it's always a negotiation. The "rules are rules" stump speech just isn't gonna fly. For weekend campouts, give the SM/ASM some blank forms, with a list of who (to your knowledge) hasn't updated them since summer camp. It's on him to hand them to the adults to fill out during coffee break, and on the adults to let the designated leader now where they'll be kept (with the troop, or with their personal gear). Literally, the adults with concerns can make their own "where to find" roster and turn that piece of paper to the SM when they bring him his coffee. If an updated form never makes it back to you, that person stays on your list and it's on him to fill it out all over again (or let the SM's know where they can find it in an emergency). Don't make this your month-to-month problem. You don't have to phone every new adult who pops up on a weekend's roster. Rechartering is enough of a nightmare, I would not add med form's to the task. Only go over everyone's forms before summer camp and/or high adventures.

In general, and it sounds like in this case, go with what the SM wants. (He's probably gonna be the one totin' that binder.) My opinion? If an adult wants to keep his med form in his pack for troop outings, it's on him to let you know where it is in case of emergencies. But, by way of improving your procedure ... it sounds like you all have to make sure you close the communication loop with whatever policy you want to decide on. So, if the SM's not in the room and you can't give him a call. Write down your motion(s), get feedback from him and the ASM's, then vote at the next meeting. If it sounds like you haven't got sufficient feedback or the person who would have to implement your policy doesn't like it, keep tabling the vote. Bottom line (and big time-saving hint): Don't vote on new policies without input from the boots on the ground!

Depends on who that someone is, if the new policy violated a more important policy (the CO's, your council's, or local, state, or federal law ... it happens), and how urgent it was that the thing be reconciled. Generally it's a good idea for the CC to get word to the committee as to why he/she needed to address the complaint in a way that was contrary to a recent vote. Otherwise slighted members will shoot off phone-calls, E-mails, and blog posts to anyone who'll listen.

IMHO, unethical and immoral have two different meanings. I mean free-to-the-public entertainment is not an inalienable right. Basically, if someone does you a service, you pay for it. We are in this brave-new-world that puts a chain of robots than between us and the people who entertain us. Then we've created this sense that "little Johnny has to see this." If that's really true, let's have the state control the media and ensure its distribution at zero cost (except for our tax dollars). I waited for years to see Star Wars, because my parents were firm believers that movie budgets should be limited. Maybe I'm a victim of neglect. At the same time, Rick's right. We're in a real fancy glass house. Throwing stones till something breaks is not a great maintenance plan. Bravo, to S915 for making his concerns known. Hopefully these adults will be a great team for years to come.

The "paper-point" crew committee challenge is on scouting.org in the form of a .pdf, but I haven't seen a related power-point. Generally, crew committees are a little bit different in the sense that the plethora of adult positions is discouraged. For example, getting the crew treasurer (a youth, a.k.a. VP of Finance) to be a meaningful position requires an adult treasurer who can mentor as well as keep books (as a backup to the youth). Not sure if anyone has put those subtle distinctions into a power point.

Here's a convenient possibility that his patrol could do together.

Got your point dS15. Don't make trouble. No point in nit-picking over ethics, unless you are willing to contribute your own activity that taps the scouts' creativity and imagination. (BTW, couscous no substitute for hummus. Tahini, maybe, but not couscous.)

Good thing about big government: Here's a quick story that may serve as a SM minute: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/measles/unprotected-story.htm It's important that folks understand that an immune-compromised scout needs everyone in his/her air space to be immunized. Like any other bogey, The goal isn't to scare boys and their families. It's to enable them to serve their country.

Also, stay friendly. There will be plenty of projects that you all will need to work on together. The boys might want to camp near each other on camporees, summer camp week might not work for one boy, but the other troop's week will. There are numerous ways to divide and conquer.

Maybe it's time to read those medical forms and personally talk to anyone with incomplete vaccine info.... Have a public health officer visit and work on the public health MB. .... Exponential growth curve analysis would be a great STEM project! ... Finally, I could see scouts in uniform being very effective in delivering informational flyers.

Pray for them. Because, no matter where they go, there they are.