qwazse

You know what’s dumber? A council patch whose name gives zero idea where you are from! Who knows where Laurel Highlands are? A few local tour companies. It’s like going to World Jambo with a “Hemisphere of Lightning Bugs” contingent patch. If fireflies would recruit for me and donate to the scholarship fund, I might see the reasoning. But USA-anything generates excitement and recognition. The point isn’t to create a new council/district for every city, the point is to envision scouts as an extension of a community to the point that communities will care deeply to recruit as many COs as possible host units.

Most all you all did not look like this (at the time) young Syrian, and I joined and stayed. This speaks to the identity game that National thinks minority parents are playing. Maybe some are, but if so they ain’t joining on account of some kids matching face on a poster. I’m looking forward to see what grandson #1 decides this year.

If it REALLY matters to those cities that all the troops in the council have the most populous city on their sleeve, then they can rally boards to form their own councils with vibrant troops. If your city doesn’t care to vie for its name on your sleeve (as a district within the council or its own council), then it’s a point for the rival municipality. Tell your scouts that their hood just doesn’t love them enough to care. Maybe one day they can change that. It might even be a platform on which they could run for local office. Crush doublespeak. Grow.

My first, and to date ignored, suggestion is to name councils after the largest city in their area. This gives communities with pride in their name and high concentrations of youth incentive to form a board to support units. In return we form youth into model representatives. Scouts travel, and the name of their city would travel with them. This runs counter to consolidation arguments, but the whole point of post-modern tech is to improve communication and cooperation among many small nodes.

Trying to decide if it’s worth my time adding comments to his video. Root causes go back into the sixties.

I joke with scouts that dens have numbers, patrols have names!” But, I get your point. The challenge is finding that charter organization who wants to support the program you have in mind.

*neckers durn autocorrect

Good luck keeping beckets on four year olds!

The bitter truth was that the Cold War wasn’t being won by flexes in space. Technical superiority was not gaining the upper hand over Vietnamese tactics. The West’s only hope was to “out-economic” the Soviets and the Maoists. A moon base was too expensive with no immediate gains, plus deep space was utterly terrifying, and too few US states had an economic benefit that contributed to Saturn V rockets. The shuttle program seemed promising with the thought that one might touch down at an airport near you, and the International Space Station, the massive Galileo Probe and the serviceable Hubble Telescope drew international engagement (i.e., spent other countries’ budgets). Closer to Earth seemed safer, although we would soon learn the folly of that presumption. The Soyuz weren’t glamorous, but even when one didn’t work, our astronauts’ odds of living to complain about it were higher. Plus Kazakhstan turned out to be a pretty cool destination after the Iron Curtain fell. We needed all that time to build up robotics, autonomous vehicles, electricity generation, and additive manufacturing … and Kevlar! But, we also needed more open risk assessment — a skill that some Japanese auto manufacturers had, but NASA had to develop (wrecking a few probes along the way even after that). And orbital mechanics had to be mastered. Although we’ve gone back to roughly the same aerodynamic profile, the scale of Orion, how it’s assembled, how it flies, and how go/no-go decisions are made eclipses anything any nation has done. It’s a testament to those decades in near earth orbit that the thing even has a toilet (although the plumbing needs more engineering). There’s a lot the space program can teach our scouts about science, but there are lessons in integrity, dedication, and fellowship that should not be ignored.

I also took time last night to stream NASA TV on a hand-held while the boys were wrapping up the meeting. About a half dozen boys were captivated as the signal came back with video from inside the capsule. There was something for everyone. Some of the boys were space-dorks like myself, others were mechanically inclined, and others were into software (how could they not be, with their advancement being checked electronically?). More importantly, all of the scouts understood when I described the capsule as something like a six-man tent. I’m starting to think about a mock-up for our next campout. (Or maybe summer camp?)

It’s nice when some writes your SM minute for you: “From the cabin of Integrity here, as we surpass the furthest distance humans have ever traveled from planet Earth, we do so in honoring the extraordinary efforts and feats of our predecessors in human space exploration. We will continue our journey even further into space before Mother Earth succeeds in pulling us back to everything that we hold dear. But we most importantly choose this moment to challenge this generation and the next to make sure this record is not long-lived.” https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-artemis-ii-crew-eclipses-record-for-farthest-human-spaceflight/

It’s like I have an evil twin. I scanned my certificate so it’s ready to mail any time my training is in doubt.

Based on data from other countries, it takes about two decades for scouting organizations who open membership to girls to stop losses and recover membership. And, those groups weren’t sued into bankruptcy. So, don’t expect to hit bottom for a while.

Perhaps being a 70s kid, I don’t see the point. Our scouts seem to be earning different elective MBs. And they’re doing it honestly. I would discourage revising a program around those who will try to short-change advancement. It only makes it more confusing for the straight shooters.

Sounds about right. The IT structure was built on the assumption of a certain number of staff available to address unique cases. Keep up those calls and this will get cleared soon enough.