ScoutNut 147 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 >>"The decision was based on what BSA felt was trademark infringement with using it's name and logo improperly" Link to post Share on other sites
evmori 11 Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 If they have nothing in writing from National, it's total bupkas! Link to post Share on other sites
Eagle732 27 Posted March 13, 2009 Author Share Posted March 13, 2009 I decided to try one of our recently purchased unauthorized fundraiser pizza kits from Corbi's for dinner tonight. Opened the box and inside is a coupon for some of their other products. On it is a picture of a group of people representing some of the groups that use Corbi's. And in this group is a Cub Scout in full uniform! Could this be what BSA is upset about? There is a disclaimer stating that those pictured should not be considered an endorsement. Link to post Share on other sites
evmori 11 Posted March 14, 2009 Share Posted March 14, 2009 If there is nothing in writing, then it's bubkas! Link to post Share on other sites
Eagle732 27 Posted March 14, 2009 Author Share Posted March 14, 2009 It might be "bubkas" but the person who reviews unit money earning requests for the council has said to me that they will not approve requests for Corbi sales. Link to post Share on other sites
hendrickms24 20 Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Did they give you a reason why the requests for Corbi sales would be denied? If they do not give you a reason or not a very good one then talk to that person's Boss. Link to post Share on other sites
hendrickms24 20 Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Which council is your troop in Baltimore or National Capital? Link to post Share on other sites
SSScout 1616 Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Mebbe it's the new uniform thing... no more red stuff? Only green? Mebbe Corbi didn't want to do pesto pizza! Only tomatoe sauce?? Naw... Link to post Share on other sites
spl229 10 Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 that is ridiculous and absurd Link to post Share on other sites
Eagle732 27 Posted May 28, 2009 Author Share Posted May 28, 2009 Baltimore Link to post Share on other sites
Eagle732 27 Posted May 28, 2009 Author Share Posted May 28, 2009 The decision was based on what BSA felt was trademark infringement with using it's name and logo improperly. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now