InquisitiveScouter

You are most welcome! That's what we are here for, brother!

Hi @Rob441! And welcome! You need to explain this problem and post his BSA ID number on the site for the Scoutbook User Advisory Council (SUAC): https://discussions.scouting.org/t/another-user-using-my-email-address1/488777 (I just grabbed that thread at random, but the SUAC admins should answer you there. Good luck!

Thank you for your wisdom 😜 Berets are not practical for the field or training environments. Even the military recognizes this. Here's a blurb from an old Army regulation: "Soldiers will not wear the beret in field or training environments, or on deployments, unless authorized by the commander. Additionally, if the commander determines other environments are unsuitable for wear of the beret, such as on work details, the commander may direct soldiers to wear other appropriate headgear." Basically, berets are a decoration. In the immortal words of Sweet Brown, "Ain't nobody got time for that." https://youtu.be/6gLMSf4afzo

We are in violent agreement on these points. My OP intent was to point out that, in making so many different sock options, SA (yes, I abbreviate it) is negating the meaning of the word "uniform". Uniforming can, and should, be decided at the Troop level. I am fine with everyone wearing jeans, a t-shirt, and a necker. As long as they are "uniform". Our Troop provides ALL elements of the "official" uniform, albeit gently used. After items are issued, you are expected to wear them according to the uniform inspection checklist. The PLC decides when uniform inspections are to be done. We have about two per year (with prizes!!) If you want something brand new, you'll have to buy that yourself. Scouts and parents are encouraged to have the Scout work to earn the money for uniform items. But no one ever does that in this neck of the woods. When I was a kid, my Dad bought my shirt, neckerchief and slide, a few patches, my Scout Handbook, and my $1 registration fee. He then gave me $3 for gas, and the family lawnmower, and told me I had to pay him back for all those items. In a few weeks, I had that made, and bought my initial round of camping gear, too... And that was in a lower middle class neighborhood. What a great lesson.

Not for you to use... ask the PLC if they want to use it. No, the adults who forced this on you, and how they did it, were the impediment...

https://filestore.scouting.org/filestore/pdf/510784(19)_Scouts_Uniform_Inspection_Sheet_WEB.pdf

Oh, no... Just got the spam Scout Shop email telling me about these new wonderful Scout socks! https://www.scoutshop.org/mcgovern-outdoor-hiking-socks.html We have a difficult enough time chasing the Uniform method and getting youth to adhere to the practice of wearing a uniform. https://www.scouting.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Scouts-BSA-Aims-and-Methods.pdf Socks is the most often overlooked item, with "I don't know where they are." as the most common response. My mantra has been, as long as it is official, they are fine... Not sure how I will react when I see a Scout wearing these: And yes, there are a few Scouts in our Troop who will wear them just to get attention, be funny, or be different... Maybe the PLC will set a common sense rule for the unit? A Scouter can hope... Side note: how much staff time, money on market research and procurement, advertising development, etc., do you think was spent on this? Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

That, my friend, is WONDERFUL news... thanks for the notice.

Agreed... that's why I said a bit more background or perspective in the article would go a long way to negating that perception.

@jcousinoand @mrjohns2, it would have been nice to have a Wildlife Manager's perspective in the article to provide some balance and background on this. (We would hope that the area is under good wildlife management, as it is a National Elk Refuge.) You are both correct, that, under the principles of Leave No Trace, we should "Leave What You Find". However, for all principles, there should be an overriding understanding that the owners and/or managers of the land have the prerogative to allow activities which might seem to be in conflict with the principles. Hunting in the National Elk Refuge is an example. The land managers know the herd is too large for the land to sustain, so they permit the hunting of elk to cull the herd to reduce the numbers to restore a balance. As I understand it, the elk antler hunt is a strictly managed, limited time, restricted entry event, so as to keep some of the antler resource in place. https://www.jacksonwy.gov/668/Antler-Shed-Hunt it is also quite funny to see the other side of this... now, some businesses are upset that the land managers and game commission are limiting the number of elk hunting licenses because the herd is getting smaller. https://www.jhnewsandguide.com/news/environmental/local/jackson-elk-herd-hunt-season-sees-deeper-cuts-following-public-comment/article_5e6a7d56-4155-4832-8403-0b4af37f3594.html 'The outfitters blamed the herd’s downturn on wolves. “The pressure from predation up there is horrific,” Taylor said.' LOL... that's the mentality we really need to change... good luck 😜

I have spent a good deal of time at Sabbatis SR, (and at Sabbatis Adventure Camp, already sold...https://www.adirondackdailyenterprise.com/news/local-news/2021/11/sabattis-camp-sold-as-scouts-declare-bankruptcy-2/ ) Two beautiful properties that were the essence of Scouting. Now gone.

yes, you are most likely correct. But it did help shift the focus of the two to deal with what they were thinking about the situation. As for integrity... it is built into Trustworthy. If I had a 13th point of the Scout Law, it would be that a Scout is Grateful.

Went with our Troop to a Merit Badge College our council organized some years ago. Two Scouts wanted to do Drafting Merit Badge for one of their activities. For Drafting Merit Badge, the pre-req was the formatting of the two sheets, and doing a drawing and lettering project. Having some minor experience in drafting, I guided them both on the research and completion of the pre-reqs. We went to the MB College... there were about 25 Scouts in this class. Counselor was an experienced Scouter and draftsman in the prestigious university we were at (Ivy League school) Only the two from our Troop had done the pre-reqs. The MBC at the end of the class handed out signed blue cards for completion to all Scouts and told them they were "On Their Honor" to complete the pre-reqs before they gave the blue card to their unit leader. I was floored, but I was not going to confront the MBC in front of the Scouts. After he dismissed them, I spoke to him, and tried, tactfully, to tell him those should have been partials, and that it would have been better if he had recognized the work done by the Scouts who made the effort to complete the badge. He said flatly that he knew this was not in accordance with the Guide to Advancement, but this was they way he had always done it, and there were never any complaints. I remember he said something to the effect of "...most of them would never get the badge otherwise." I told him I would file a complaint with the council, because this violated the Guide to Advancement, his own Scout Oath and Law, and put those Scouts in a really bad position. The blue card states, "The applicant has personally appeared before me and demonstrated to my satisfaction that all requirements have been met for ..." and he was willfully lying on the form. When I filed the form with council, guess what happened??? Nothing. (Counselor was also a regular donor...) How does that meet our mission " ... to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law." ??? I did have a chat with our two Scouts later. Both were upset they had done the work when others hadn't, and they felt cheated. I told them they were not cheated... it was the other Scouts who were cheated. These two had gotten their just reward because they had earned it. The others were give the burden of a lie they will carry with them always.

Local camp runs six MB periods during the day, and an evening period on two different nights. That's 8 badges... and for many of the "academic" ones, you can bring your "workbook" filled out to one of the instructors (not a counselor, btw), and be given the badge.

"Heck, you can probably earn be given one or more Citizen MBs just while at camp if the scout does some self-study before camp." There, fixed that for you

Wait... what is this "patrol" thing you speak of??? LOL

I have never witnessed the inner workings of this "meatgrinder" or "professional proficiency" you speak of. What do you mean by this, say, with reference to specific skills?? Are you referring to a Troop which tests Scouts multiple times, or where, during an SM conference, the SM tests skills and refuses to sign off that conference unless the Scout demonstrates proficiency? I have heard of units like that, but either they do not last long, or the adults who create that climate move on fairly quickly and the pendulum moves toward the model (or swings past to the "anything can get signed off." ) The requirements themselves demand some level of proficiency... For example, the First Class requirement to demonstrate a square lashing... it had better start with a clove hitch on one pole, have three full wraps which alternate inside and outside of the previous wraps, two full fraps, and end with a clove hitch on the other pole. All this is according to the Scout Handbook. If it doesn't have those elements, it's not a square lashing, and that doesn't get signed off. I note that the description of "The Four Steps of Advancement" in the Scout Handbook says, in step "2. You are tested: Once you feel that you have mastered a skill, a leader tests you..." [emphasis added] That might be where some people go off the deep end... the word mastery is very subjective, and means different things to different people. But, I find the word "mastery" in no requirements themselves.

Yes. And have seen stuff like this for years... like, starting in the mid to late 1990's. It falls in line with some council-run Summer Camp merit badge "mill" models many have created. (Some camps are known for this (ours) and are packed with Scouts each year.) Not unusual for a Scout to do a week of camp here and walk away with 8 to 11 MBs... And still not know how to tie a taut line hitch 😜, fold a flag, start a fire, identify some common animals and plants, swim 100 yards (much less float and pass the Swimmer check), read a map, use a compass, measure 100 yards, know the difference between frostbite and hypothermia, or the difference between heat exhaustion and heat stroke (or treatment for any of the four) etc. etc. etc. If councils will not run a program with integrity, units will follow suit... We have a Troop of about 45 Scouts... less than 20% of them come to me when they want to learn a skill and get signed off. But those Scouts know their stuff, and are the ones approved by the SM to sign off other Scouts. The other 80+% have other leaders they will seek out for sign offs, because they know they'll get it easy. (The leaders knowledge is Fair to Poor also... but, hey! they did IOLS!!) The really sad part is, I adhere to the mantra: "The requirements, and nothing more! The requirements, and nothing less!"

OK, so 2024 is 388,941 for Scouts. A ~1% drop from 2023, (but probably including the numbers covered by the grace period??) Cub Scout numbers from 2023: 574,365 2024: 589,253 a ~2.6% increase. Let's hope that is reality, because Cubs is the primary feeder for Scouts.

Other than "lawyer" and "Scout", what names did I call you, pray tell? Upon further reexamination, I retract both.

Well, your legal analysis is shoddy. You have assumed the parents' intent without any knowledge other than the OP. And cast several other aspersions on them without any verifiable facts. As a lawyer, you should know better. As a Scout, you should be ashamed.

And I'll bet you the BSA Annual Report had numbers as of year end, which would include those under the grace period... that is, people who did not pay their renewal fees under the new system, but were being carried on the rolls anyway. So, whenever we do get to see the 2024 Annual Report, you could probably cut those numbers by 20-25% to get closer to reality.

I wasn't making that comparison, but was showing the effects of hiding numbers with a "grace" period. But, since you asked... From Apr 24 to Apr 25: Cub Scout: 2.4% loss, with a loss of 8 Packs Scout: 5.7% loss, with a loss of 8 Troops Venturing: 49% loss, with a loss of 1 Crew (it was a big and popular Crew) Exploring: 11% loss, with a loss of 3 Posts

BTW, 2019 numbers for Scouts: 798,516 2023 numbers for Scouts: 392,275 A 50.87% loss over four years... ouch Prepare for an even more loss for 2024...

Good luck finding it... I looked for about 20 minutes, with no success. I'm sure you'll share when able P.S. Last one posted on BSA website?? 2019 https://www.scoutingnewsroom.org/about-the-bsa/annual-reports/ Although, you can view 2023's here... https://www.scouting.org/about/annual-report/ But scan through the links... what's with not putting them up after 2019?