Mrjeff

Because I didn't know there was a time limit.

All of the above. Its simple, if you refuse to acknowledge God you can't be a Scout because you can't afirm and acknowledge your DUTY TO GOD as dictated by the SCOUT OATH. If thats the case, find something else to do, it's that simple. But the BSA would rather change the rules for the individual, and do. The BSA used to have very high standards and received Devine blessings and when they no lounger held to those standards God (or whatever name you want to use) has withheld those blessings. People are still walking away and any presumption of growth is propoganda and a false positive. Thats my opinion and at this point there is no going back. This opinion is based on my conservative stance and 50+ years as a member of the Boy Scouts of America. There is no need to debate the issue because I will not change my opinion and am thankful that I am associated with Scouters who share this opinion.

Sure my friend. AIA is a common acronym used by Order of the Arrow members meaning American Indian Affairs. Some my claim that this is offensive but our AIA chairman is an American Indian and uses the acronym freely. The national OA leadership banned all AIA activities at the National OA Conference

Its analogy and the point is that if someone doesn't want to follow the rules they won't be able to participate. The rules don't change to fit the person.

I agree with you guys. It's sad that some guy just does this without consideration for what the members want to do.

I go back to my analogy of a sports team. If someone wants to play ice hockey then they get skates, pads and a hockey stick. They learn the rules, agree with the rules and play hockey. If someone wants to be a Scout they get a uniform and some camping gear and a good pair of shoes. They learn the rules and agree to follow the rules and then go and Scout. Hockey doesn't change the rules to expand membership and try to make it where everybody plays hockey. The worst mistake that Scouting has ever made is changing the rules to satisfy a minority who didn't like the old rules. If Scouting wasn't for you, go someplace else, apply and pay your fees and follow the set of rules that you like. Show up at a hockey game with a golf club and guess what, you can't play.

Wow, another fatal wound to the Order of the Arrow. It looks like the National whoever realized that no matter how they propogandized, pushed and bullied the OA, they just couldn't handle the blowback from most of the local lodges concerning removing Native american regalia, clothing or dress (whatever is politically correct) during ceremonies. So, in their wisdom and treachery, banned all AIA activities at NOAC. I guess whoever fails to realise that many or even most lodges really enjoy AIA activities and are dedicated to the dance, dress, music and ceremonies of the AIA. It will be interesting to learn how this decision effects the number of NOAC participants and therefore the money. It will be interesting to see just how many lodges that have been preparing for AIA events for years just don't bother attending. Just food for thought. I would suggest that every Lodge Advisor call the national office and voice their opinions. Oh, never mind, they don't answer the phone😑

Thanks, that's my understanding, too.

I know that everybody has been busy with the Jamboree but NOAC is fast approaching. I havnt seen much info yet, have I missed something? If so, where do I find the latest news about NOAC 2024?

"Tos" and "want" and grammatical accuracy, hmmmmm.............chritising spelling? Is that really important and necessary?

Wow, this has gotten way of track...my initial post is simple, its a shame that a young man was forced to make a decision wherein he felt as though he could no longer be a part of an organization that goes against his morals, values and beliefes, an this is a common reaction to the current state of the BSA. Agree or disagree, interpreting this how ever you like, it's a sad state of affairs.

Oh by the way, because I think that something is offensive, then I'm offended, and if I am stating something that someone else finds offensive then they just have to be offended.

Again, incorrect. I take offense to the idea of yelling INCLUSION, INCLUSION, INCLUSION from the mountain top but encouraging certain segments of a group to have segregated and separate events and recognition for those groups. If ANYONE EVEN SUGGESTED that there should be a separate gathering for straight white males the charges of racism and segregation would be shouted by the masses. But it's just fine and acceptable to have separate events for gay, black, and female members. This is so blatenly hypothetical that if its not obvious to those who condone this then there is no reason to discuss this any further.

Actually I said what I said so I am willing to say it. Making assumptions about another person's opinions, state of mind or thought processes is very presumptive and often incorrect. To, me you have completly missed the point but appreciate the effort that you took to evaluate and interpret my initial post, even though you are incorrect. If you have ever red any of my earlier contributions you would see that I often say what I say and standat attention right next to and along side of what I say. The funny thing is, this post is about what someone else said. Hmmmmmm?

I said what I said and it is what it is. Regardless of my interpretation many will feel differently and will disagree with his position as well as my interpretation. The Boy Scouts ain't what it used to be and will never be what it was. Like it or not, that's how it is and the results are obvious.. Compair public opinion, membership numbers, public support, religious support, community support and the overall general consensus of people in and outside of Scouting. It is what it is.

If it didn't take place at a Scouting event it isn't a Scouting issue. Trying to dictate what a young person does on /heir own time with their friends and associates is no concern of Scouting. This may appear as unsympathetic but Scouting is not responsible for every member at all times. These rules appear to be another attempt to insulate the BSA from future problems. The idea of fals inclusion is demonstrated by the BSA when they have special recognition for groups that are singular in nature. Patches and gatherings for black Scouts, LGBTQ Scouts and female Scouts recognizes individual groups and incourages divisiveness not inclusion. If there is not a gathering for straight white males, that group is being segregated and discriminated against. Inclusiviness involves everyone, not specific groups inside of a larger group. All of this malarkey is being propagated ti keep the business of the Boy Scouts alive, when in reality the Boy Scouts is following the path of the Hudson.

Sure, some great BSA important person thinks that the YPT rules apply to everyone in Scouting wherever they are, at all times, nregardless if it pertains to Scouting events or not. The BSA thinks that they have the authority to dictate the everyday relationships especially involving 18-20 year old kids including their friends at school. This is way far overreach.

Yes indeed, I have no idea where the BSA got the idea that they have any authority to direct the activities of anyone outside of a Scouting event. Is the BSA going to establish a group of investigators to watch what every member is doing at all times? How far do they think they can go before the whole thing implodes?

I disagree that he in any way compromised his values. When this young man entered Scouting he had no idea about the direction that the Scouting organization would take, and at that young age, really didn't care. As he grew and matured and made a personal choice to become an Eagle Scout, his knowledge, understanding and awareness increased. He felt compelled to reach his goal of becoming an Eagle Scout even though his view of the BSA became very negative. This alone strengthens the idea that sexual preference, gender identification, or this false concept of inclusion has no place in the Boy Scouts of America. I recently saw an ad for patches that celebrate the LGBTQ community, " people of color " and women in Scouting. Aren't the straight white male members being excluded or are the powers that be too week to make that available, or would that be racist or homofobic. Inclusion means inclusion and as far as the fees go, I would like to know just how many young people are EXcluded because they just can't afford the cost.

I'm not going to talk about experience or credentials because that's not what this is all about so please leave those comments out of this. For the first time at an Eagle Scout Board of Review I received an answer to a commonly asked question. The question was, "do you plan to continue your Scouting career once you complete the Eagle Scout requirements?" The answer was very disheartening, "Sir, although Scouting has been a great experience, I can't continue participating in an organization that is in conflict with my morals and beliefs." That is a fine example of a young man who refuses to compromise. He also has a younger brother who has nearly completed his Eagle Scout requirements, but is doing so as a Lone Scout program rather than be part of a group that has compromised its values. This has nothing to do with inclusion, acceptance or tolerance, its just an example of a young man willing to stand by his beliefs, morals and home training. This isn't a teaching oppertunity or an opportunity for discussion, that is not the purpose of an Eagle Scout Board of Review. This is an axample of a young man who stands firm on his beliefs no matter how hard others try to change his mind.

I may get another naughty notice but......this is just another example of how the Boy Scouts of America is a rusty machine that is grinding itself to pieces. This whole BSA thing is being administered by a bunch of colleged indoctrinated people who can't see the big picture of how they are destroying a once great and respected organization. A lot of people like to quote Baden-Powell but don't like to mention his comments on turning the Scouts into a corps of professionals or letting the "yanks" getting their hands on Woodbadge because "they'll only muck it up". Unfortunately many of the new BSA indoctrinated leaders won't really know about scouting because they have never experienced it. Folks don't know how jacked up and sideways things have gotten because they don't know the difference.

What another pile of boulderdash that some employee/ bean counter of BSA has developed to justify their own job. It wasn't that long ago that every unit in a council was required to re charger on the same date. Along with the re charter came re registration and everything that goes along with that. I can just hear it now, " we can't go because Mr. X, Mr. Y, and Mr. Z have expired registrations!" Increasing fees for volunteers and kids is a GRAND way to boost membership since opening the door to girls and the LGBTQ community didn't work. In a few years the organization known as the Boy Scouts of America will be unrecognizable.

I love to discuss things with the likes of backpacker, I always gain wisdom and insight to so many things. Y'all can argue and say " you are wrong" but here's a little tidbit that may shed some light on this. Law Enforcement Explorer's, and there is such a thing even if they're they are in Exploring, have a recognition device for Eagle Scouts and several years ago Exploring authorized that same device for the Girl Scout Gold Award. As far as BSA goes it really doesn't matter because uniforms are only optional and suggested so I guess the patches that one puts on their shirt doesn't really matter either.

I agree with everything you say. But, Scouting is not a universal platform for teaching the lessons of life. There are many fine organizations that do the same things without Scoutings specific guidelines. If anyone feels uncomfortable following these guidelines they are free to go elsewhere. Its foolish to change the rules to meet the needs of the individual; it's up to the participant to follow the rules.