Jump to content

KublaiKen

Members
  • Content Count

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by KublaiKen

  1. And I think the BSA'a approach has been a good one. I get it that not all (or any) may agree with me. I'm OK with that. As for the GSUSA, I passively support the organization and wish them well, but my active support (dollars and volunteer hours) is for the BSA, so that is where I'll target my opinions.
  2. That your choice of terms when describing the well-earned recognition these incredible girls and young women are receiving is interesting.
  3. Being recognized for an incredible accomplishment is not the same as bragging. Bragging Fanfare Grandstanding Your choice of terms when describing the well-earned recognition these incredible girls and young women are receiving is interesting.
  4. Not at all, nor did I say that. That it isn't as publicly recognized or lauded is simply true. And none of this is about showing off to the GSUSA; it's in part (and in my view) a way to publicly demonstrate that the two organizations are not the same, and that these girls are members of Scouts BSA. There is nothing in my view of this that is sexist nor bragging; the BSA would be foolish to ignore this PR opportunity at almost every level, and those who oppose it are, in my view, hiding the sexist view that girls don't belong behind a "what about the boys" argument.
  5. I respectfully disagree with this. 1. There has been plenty of fanfare about boys reaching Eagle in the past 110 years. That is what has made it one of the single-most recognizable and lauded youth accomplishments, and one that has carried into adulthood for 110 years. 2. Because girls have not had that opportunity for over a century, this occasion is historic, noteworthy, and therefore newsworthy. 3. A struggling organization like the BSA, both in finances and in public perception, would be somewhere between naive and negligent not to take advantage of this as a PR blast.
  6. I thought they did a great job. Thanks for the heads up on the CBS interviews tonight.
  7. I have not heard of that in the context of their there not being a previous relationship (e.g., first year Scouts calling AOLs from their previous Pack). But I don't see anything very weird about it, though I readily admit I could be viewing it differently or wrongly. Can you articulate your thoughts on why you feel that way? It might help me see what I'm missing. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...