Krampus

If that were true than fund raising itself would not be allowed given your definition. Private benefit is defined in the code. Non-profits are allowed to raise funds for a particular event. They are allowed to target those funds -- as long as they are applied evenly -- to all scouts who raised funds. This is spelled out in the code.

My advice would be to talk to a tax attorney because I am sure I am glossing over the details. What I understood from our meeting with ours I posted here. What was clear was that you could not hold a generic fund raiser and deposit what the boys sold into their ISAs. You could have a generic fund raiser and put all money in the general account and then split equally among all scouts. You could also have a fund raiser for all scouts going to [insert activity] and all participating scouts should have an equal share of those proceeds put in their ISAs while excluding those scouts who did not participate. While this looked like a private benefit, our guy noted a few IRS guidelines that negated the appearance of private benefit for that scenario. It's convoluted as you would expect from tax code and guidelines, that's why we hired an expert.

The lightest one I've seen is 3.3 lbs. Worth the weight in someone's pack.

Interesting. I think I agree. We had a district event the other night. I was a chance for the Cub Scouts to meet the troops and talk to them. Think convention table top displays. It reminded me of rushing a fraternity when I was in college. The troops were out in force trying to reel Webelos in to talk. Most were talking AT kids/parents rather than asking them what questions they had. My guys just answered questions. I could hear parents complaining that they were overwhelmed. How does hit relate to council? The district and council people present took the opportunity to chat up the troop leaders there trying to get them to bump up their JTE numbers, sign up for WB, volunteer for a committee, etc. Both them and the troop leaders were more concerned with the whole "business of scouting" rather than the people that make up scouting: the kids and the parents. As I was leaving this nice lady came by and said that my guys were the nicest to their kids and we were the only troop that "seemed to care about the parents and the kids". While I was happy to hear that I was saddened that 25+ troops and a dozen district/council folks were cast in such a bad light in front of 150+ Cubs and their parents. If this is representative of what is happening in other councils/districts it is no small wonder things like this happen in councils eventually.

We co-mingle summer camp with council high adventure. We try to stay at camps that offer a balance between adventure, MBs, first year scout and decent cost (under $320). Most usually offer rates between $220-280 for out of council troops but they usually offer 1-5 free adults. Transport usually runs us about $300/scout for a bus. Not cheap but if you have ever spent summer camp in Texas you'd know why we leave for cooler climates.

And that big an area has problems with money? Any reason why they are losing so much they need to close down and sell these camps?

This is a Chicago area council? Wow, are they losing membership/money that much?

I'm stunned. That's something I would let the district know. If they treat a scout like that openly imagine what else might be going on. This is a big fear of mine for any scout, but especially with scouts I know are less popular. I try to make every ECOH when possible. I think I've missed two (one due to surgery) in all my years. I always try to make sure the ASMs and PLC are in attendance and encourage parents to get rsvps months in advance so they can drive attendance. Congrats to your son. It is a huge accomplishment!!

If you made this statement in Texas you might not make it out alive.

ISA's are not prohibited nor will it raise a red flag just because you use them. That is a myth backed up here. You need to avoid private benefits and a few other things. You'd be surprised how easy it is to get a tax attorney or CPA to review the applicable tax code and advisories and your unit's approach. Many people will do this pro bono if your paperwork is good. We had a parent (with this background) look over our stuff.

We are honest with the parents that join our troop about a few things: Kids are going to argue. Yeah, this is Boy Scouts and scouts are expected to live the Oath and Law, but nobody is perfect, these kids see each other at school and sports, so conflicts are going to happen. We let the resolve but monitor for safety. Bullying is strictly monitored. Colorful language will get dropped at some point. We're not monks. Even a monk might curse if he hits his thumb with a hammer. 11-17 year old boys are no different. Society, social media, parenting styles all impact how guys act in school as well as scouts. We don't expect saints but don't be surprised if a scout (or YOUR scout) is an Eddie Haskell in the making. Accidents happen. When you hike, canoe, swim, ski, shoot and do all the things we do, Timmy WILL get injured despite all the training and prep we do. Deal with it and don't look to blame others. Most accidents come from Timmy not paying attention. Hold your scout responsible. Unless you hover over him at school, as he plays sports or when he's out playing with his friends, don't hover over him at scouts. Some parents (not many) want more hands on. Great, there's plenty of troops in my area that will do that. The parents that stay with us accept this philosophy and try to hold their kids accountable. We lose about 5 kids a year because their parents didn't pay attention at crossover as to how we work, but we more than make up for that in transfers in and recruiting.

Mexican Lasagna. Same items as you'd use in regular lasanga (except corn tortillas instead of noodles) but then add in taco seasoning and other mexican cheeses as you layer in. Great dish.

Same here. If I don't know the scout I won't take the meeting until I talk to his leader for these exact reasons. We meet at Starbucks and I require that I meet the parent and the scout before we begin work if I don't know them. This is my policy to protect me. If someone doesn't like it they can find another counselor.

This doesn't happen overnight. What is national doing to proactively assess and help councils? Anyone know? I'd be interested what programs national has in place to monitor and help councils...also to see how effective these programs have been.

...and further confounded by the blue card itself which would seem to indicate that the unit leader signature is de facto authorization to begin working on the MB in question.

Have him get certified to teach CPR/AED. You can then teach other troops and raise funds at the same time.

Send a runner. Pop smoke and make a landing pad. If that's not an option, carry out with minimum movement for the vic. Basically if they're fully envenomated they have few options. Staying put is the worst.

Somewhat related... http://blog.scoutingmagazine.org/2015/07/16/travel-in-uniform-for-bsa-insurance-coverage/

We recommend this for our scouts. It is a good, sturdy pack and for a 50L pack holds a great deal. Works for 90% of our outings. Would not recommend for extended high adventure trips but it works just fine...and the price is right!

Nope. Never seen it. And if it is not in the GTA I won't follow it. Geesh, isn't life hard enough already?

Interesting tent guide which may be helpful. Take a look at the tent at the end. Could you ever imagine such a thing?

This reminds me of my CERT training and the use of the "black tag". I thought CERT was going to teach all this advance EMT-type stuff. When I saw the black tags and why we use them, I learned quickly that we don't do CPR in CERT situations. Not sure I'd agree if I was in the situation and saw the kid dying. Agree the training should focus on making good medical decisions (e.g., leave the knife in, don't pull the stick out, stabilize the patient and send runners, pop smoke and wait for care flight, etc.).

@@Stosh, you have training most people don't. If two leaders from each unit are required to take the WFA the unit in my area offers, they will get some pretty serious training. One of the ASMs in that troop who is an EMT, says the training their unit gives if pretty darn near what he took to get his EMT-Basic certification. He said it was far better than his ECA training, at least as far as covering how to care for wounded when medical care is many hours or even days away. As far as worst medical case I have seen away from care. A scout opened up his knee cap and was bleeding bad. We stabilized him, stopped the bleeding, immobilized the leg, and got him to care a few hours later (carried out). I was a scout...we were 14. In terms of getting sued, let's face it, as soon as you take a group anywhere the likelihood of a lawsuit rears its head. Whether you give aid or not, if ANYTHING happens on that trip, as an adult leader you open yourself up to a lawsuit. I can live with a lawsuit. I could not live with myself if there was a child injured and I was ill-prepared to do everything within my power to save him. On that I know we feel the same. As long as the WFA training is comprehensive and standardized so that everyone gets the same training (and not just powerpoint or glorified band-aid care) I am all for it.

Nice thoughts @@DuctTape, but getting more than 4 boys together to do anything with all the things they're involved in is terribly difficult these days.

Yup, try putting out a note to districts in large metro councils near your home (Dallas comes to mind), asking if any unit is upgrading gear to donate their old gear to your unit. I am sure you'd could fund two troops with donations. In my district alone I know a unit that recently gave away all their gear because it was too (4 years) old.