Scouting History
Share and celebrate the history of the world's largest youth Movement
533 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 956 views
-
- 0 replies
- 585 views
-
- 0 replies
- 463 views
-
- 0 replies
- 557 views
-
- 3 replies
- 814 views
-
- 0 replies
- 554 views
-
- 4 replies
- 3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 616 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 3 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 502 views
-
- 8 replies
- 3.7k views
-
LATEST POSTS
-
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
While I agree with your sentiment, I understand why they do this. It is men, by far, who are statistically more likely to appear in the reports, or be convicted, of sexual abuse (notice how I phrased that...) https://www.ussc.gov/research/quick-facts/sexual-abuse From that page, note that ~92% of offenders were men, and ~72% of offenders had little or no prior criminal history. It is not about you or me, it's about "us." We men appear to be the overwhelming majority of the problem. I do believe there is a lot more adult female to youth male abuse that goes on that is not reported, and that the societal tide is turning on reporting and convicting those women who abuse. (See recent reports, particularly from school settings.) But the numbers will never near parity with men as perpetrators. This is a policy made though the input of actuarials, lawyers, and public relations folks, among others. -
By Eagle94-A1 · Posted
National could remove the double standard, i.e. 2 females can take males youth out, but 2 males cannot take female youth out. -
We are chartered to a civilian organization. This will be interesting for our Cub Scout pack though. I will say that there is a grain of truth in the lack of standards being upheld. As far as our troop, we have very few Scouts who are above First Class, so doing advancement at meetings is vital. However, our PLC is failing them by not actually doing advancement. -
By InquisitiveScouter · Posted
That was quick... this just in my inbox: Statement Regarding NPR Story on Scouting and the U.S. Military Scouting Family, This morning NPR aired a story about a supposed leaked Pentagon memo directing the U.S. Military to sever ties with Scouting America. According to the story, the draft memo, which has not been sent to Congress, indicates that the Secretary of War plans to cease support for youth in Scouting programs on military bases in the U.S. and overseas, cut support for the National Jamboree, and eliminate increases in pay grade for Eagle Scouts who enlist in the military. Listen to the story here or you can read the story here. We are surprised and deeply saddened by this news. The Scouting movement has had a strong relationship with our nation’s military going back more than a century. From the tremendous support of the West Virginia National Guard at our National Jamborees to Scout troops that provide stability for the children of military families deployed around the globe, our nation’s military has walked side-by-side with Scouts for generations. An enormous percentage of those in our military academies are Scouts and Eagle Scouts. Our Scouts and leaders admire and are inspired by our military heroes. Many of our Scouts trade their Scouting uniforms for the uniforms of our nation’s armed forces. According to the story, the draft memo purports that the Scouting organization is “no longer a meritocracy” and does not hold members to high standards. This view is clearly uninformed. Badges and ranks are not given, they are earned. Just ask any Eagle Scout. Young men and young women alike thrive in Scouting. Scouts wear an American flag on their sleeves and swear a duty to God and country. Scouting isn’t something we do. It’s something we are. Scouting will never turn its back on the children of our military families. Just as we always have, Scouts will continue to put duty to country above duty to self and will remain focused on serving all American families in the U.S. and abroad. Scouting is and has always been a nonpartisan organization. For more than a century, we’ve worked with every U.S. presidential administration – Republican and Democrat – focusing on our common goal of building future leaders grounded in integrity, responsibility, and service. We will continue our efforts to work with the Pentagon to address this critical issue. At the same time, I encourage each of you to contact your senators and congressional representatives immediately and ask for their support. You can locate contact information for your representative at these links: House and Senate. Some of you may be discouraged by this news, but, just like the service men and women of our military, a Scout is brave. I see this as a clear call to redouble our efforts. All youth are in crisis today. They need the fun, adventure and the challenging, character-building programs of Scouting more than ever. Support your local councils. Lift up your fellow volunteer leaders and Scouting families. Let’s prepare the next generation for lives of purpose and impact. Yours in Scouting, Roger Krone Chief Scout Executive President & CEO Scouting America -
Going to be really hard to enforce. Garrison commanders have an extreme amount of authority and flexibility on how they run the base(s) under their command. It's highly unlikely that any order will explicitly state that US military cannot partner or work with etc ... Scouting America; instead it will likely state something like "no diversion of mission critical resources"; which plays into the garrison commanders ability to basically do whatever he wants.
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)