Jump to content

HelpfulTracks

Members
  • Content Count

    871
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Posts posted by HelpfulTracks

  1. An easy and cheap way is to use painters drop canvas (not splattered with paint of course). Cut a swath out that is about twice the depth of the longest knife and wide enough to accommodate the number of knives you need ( about the width + 4 inches for each of the knives you plan to roll laid side by side - I wouldn't put more than 6 or so in one roll).  Lay the longest knife on the roll about  about 3 inches from left edge, place it so that it is centered depth wise, then place the remaining knives about 2-3 inches apart so they are laid out left to right with the tips facing you. Once they are laid out, fold the top and bottom flaps so they cover the knives. Then start rolling. Use a rubber band or paracord to secure the roll. 

    I do the same for long spoons, spatulas, tongs etc. Keeps everything nice and neat and clean. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 1
  2. I am not a fan of requiring earning Honor Patrol to count PL toward rank advancement. To much is outside of the control of the Scout. 

    I had a patrol that would have not been able to achieve this and they were very good. It was a six member patrol of older scouts (5 of which achieved Eagle Scout), all had recently earned Star rank together. Their PL would have failed because none achieved Life Scout within the next 6 month period . They also had no chance to grow unless we broke up another patrol (in which case the PL's PoR would not have counted) so they could not grow.

    Now with the rule of 2 - 21+ registered leaders makes doing patrol outings extremely difficult. 

    I have no problem setting a standard, but it should be a standard that does not reply so much on the efforts of others. 

  3. The purpose if this thread is lost on me. 

    I understand, and mostly agree, that judging history with a modern moral code can skew history itself. But throughout its history, the klan was out of step with the moral code of its time.  

    I was born in the 60's and grew up in the 70's and 80's in Birmingham Al, a hot spot for civil rights strife. I have know klansmen in my life, virtually all hid the fact they were in the klan, which tells me even they knew how heinous their ideas were. I have literally had physical confrontation with them as they attacked my friends. Once I found out someone was in the klan, no amount of good they had done before seemed to be redeeming. Donating to the BSA is not a redeeming quality for the klan. 

    That is not to say someone can't redeem themselves. I knew two men in the 80's who were friendly, perhaps even friends, but at least civil and cordial. One had lost his daughter in the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, the other was a white police officer who was infamous for a photo of him holding a dog that was attacking a black protestor. The events of the time changed both men. Individual redemption is possible and laudable, but I don't see any way for an organization whose entire existence was dedicated to the subjugation of people. 

    Whatever this thread is about, it feels like glorification or at least applauding of the very little "good" an evil group may have done. 

    • Upvote 2
  4. On 6/18/2021 at 10:08 AM, ShutterbugMom said:

    I thought someone here with more knowledge than me might know.  Does it state in the Scout Handbook or the Troop Leaders handbooks that scouts may not have cell phones?  I cannot find it, but we were told by a certain leader that this is the case. 

    Let me be clear that I have no problem with cell phones not being allowed if it is announced ahead of time.  I do have a problem with a leader that takes my son's phone when he didn't have it out and she made him (and the rest) dig it out of their bags.  These are all high school age boys at a high adventure camp and they had them for pictures as we were told there was no cell phone reception.  And now there are few pictures and the parents were in the dark about what was going on for nearly a week.  I would just like to know where this is the handbook for my own sanity.  Thanks!

    No national rules, though I have heard some councils have rules, though I am not sure its anything more than an urban legend. Units often have rules about cell phones. I am good with that if they are clear and uniformly enforced. Meaning adults lead by example and follow the same rule. But, I prefer rules about usage rather than a strict prohibition. Scouts use cells for photos, and they have been handy in emergencies. 

    As for high adventure bases, cell phones are practically useless for communication or GPS tracking as they still need a signal and those are extremely rare on the trails of Philmont, Northern Tier and Sea Base. As for photos, a scout is much better off with a camera because phones are too easily damaged and the cost (read weight and space) for a phone and batteries is far grater than for a GoPro or small digital camera. 

  5. On 2/29/2004 at 11:10 AM, Owl62 said:

    1. Has adopted a troop neckerchief?  Yes

    2. If so, is it a official stock neckerchief or a custom neckerchief? Custom

    3. How is the neckerchief worn? (Under the shirt collar, shirt collar turned under) Do all unit member wear it the same way or may they opt for either under the collar or collar turned under on an individual basis? Over the collar and that was determined to be the uniform standard by the PLC

    4. Please describe the adopted neckerchief. What is the basic color? I am especially interested in hearing about custom neckerchiefs. Three different units (Troop, Crew, Ship), each has had various color neckers and piping/trim  over the years, but all 3 have had custom unit log embroidered into the necker

    5. If your troop has adopted a neckerchief is and when is its wear required? Troop wears neckers whenever they are in field uniforms. Crew and Ship wear neckers with field and activity uniforms, but not with activities where it might be a hazard or ruin the necker or would be problematic (backpack for example)

    6. Do all members of the troop including adults wear the adopted neckerchief? If not, what if any do others wear? Some variations that I have seen are: Everyone has and wears the unit necker, but no one gets fussy if someone is wearing Wood Badge, Jambo, Philmont etc. In fact we have encouraged it as it raises questions and interest. 

     

     

  6. I am going to take a different view and look as 2022 as an opportunity. Sort of like the forest fire that, while doing a great deal of damage, burns out the dead wood and undergrowth to lead the regrowth of a healthier forest. 

    We will certainly have a leaner National organization, and almost certainly leaner local organizations. The role of the volunteer will become even more important. One can hope that those who remember what the patrol method is, what Aims and Methods are about can help rebuild a healthier, albeit smaller organization that lives by the Oath and Law on a daily basis. One who puts more of the outing in Scouting again. 

    Pollyanna? Possibly, but I have always been the glass is half full kind of guy. My Eagle, the OA, the Oath and Law still have a great deal of meaning to me and I hope always will. I feel an obligation to pay forward what Scout has done for me.

    • Upvote 1
  7. On a more serious note, some white supremist groups have been appropriating Nordic symbols as their own. 

    There are some Nordic heritage groups that are rightfully outraged that these racist are using symbols of their culture for more than 1000 years as part of war of hate. 

    Unfortunately, in todays culture, for some, the only meaning is the one they see today and the history means nothing. 

    So, short answer, you really need to have a discussion with your leaders about the specific symbols you are using and what, if any, modern day message they may send. 

    • Upvote 1
  8. Perhaps this has already been said, but Home Repair does not specify the home is being repaired.  When, I have asked scouts to talk to grandma/grandpa, aunts, uncles, cousins, friends, and neighbors, they usually found more than enough to fix without straying too far from the appointed list. 

  9. In the discussion I have been involved it is still up in the air, but...

    2022 - is all but officially a no go. In part because the logistical wheels would need to be in full motion at this point and they are not. Could something be pulled together? Possibly, but it would be very high risk of failure. Secondly, it is also NOAC in 2022 which is already in full motion. 

    2023 - This is a possibility. First, the US contingent has a limited on how many can go to World Jamboree, but it is still likely several thousand. Second, the cost for South Korea will be several thousand dollars due to cost of flying. There may be some contractual obligations to work out with WOSM about not conflicting, but given Covids impact the last couple of years, it can probably be worked out. Third, it may be a more attractive opportunity than 2024, which is the year before the next SCHEDULED Jamboree.

    2024 - Possibly, but not as likely as 2023 or waiting to 2025. Holding Jambo in 2024 would mean not having 2025 and would make the next Jambo 5 years out in 2029. I can see them doing a 2023 and a 2025 and getting Jambo back on a regular schedule. 

    • Thanks 1
  10. 4 minutes ago, David CO said:

    It is funny that you used the expression "red herring" in a post that completely distracts from the topic of unit non-participation in OA to an unrelated topic of CO approval of unit leaders.  

     

    And yet, was completely applicable in addressing the post you made. 

    • Upvote 1
  11. I don't come to this forum as often as I used to, so I came to this post late. 

    I have read much about what the OA is and is not here, some of it right and some wrong. 

    First, the OA is not separate from the BSA, it is part of the BSA. And its mission is to support the BSA in achieving its mission.

    No, the OA, or even BSA, cannot force a unit to hold elections. But I think it is a poor reflection on those units that do not hold elections when they have eligible scouts. 

    In some cases I find that it's a unit leader that does not understand what the OA is or what it can do for a scout and what that scout can take back to their unit. 

    In some cases I find it is a controlling unit leader who has created an adult led unit and either wants to control every aspect in a scouts "Scouting Experience" or worse is afraid the scout will see a real life example of youth led and come back with big ideas. 

    And yes, some lodges, just like units and councils, do things better than others. 

    Regardless, when a unit leader denies scouts the opportunity to join the OA, they are short changing the scouts twice. Once by not allowing them to take advantage of what the OA has to offer the scout and second by not allowing those same scouts to bring back what the OA teaches to the unit. 

    • Upvote 2
  12. On 6/20/2021 at 1:57 PM, David CO said:

    If we have learned anything from the scandals and bankruptcy, it is that BSA cannot be depended upon to safeguard our kids.  The Chartered Organizations need to step up and take responsibility.  We can't rely on any other outside group to do it.  Safeguarding our kids is our responsibility.

    This is a red herring. Having looked at the files, which have been public for a while now, the vast majority, dare I say 99+% of cases of abuse involved unit leaders that we selected and approved by the CO. Even recently, I have seen CO;s dig in for a fight when the council has rejected someone the CO has approved. 

     

    • Upvote 2
  13. On 6/18/2021 at 3:49 PM, David CO said:

    I think you are all missing the point.  

    The Chartered Organization has an obligation to protect its children.  The CO can protect its children while they are participating in unit activities, but the CO has no control over OA.  The CO cannot protect its children at OA activities.

    Why would a CO want to have a "pipeline" from its unit to some other program whose leadership and activities are totally outside the CO's control?  It doesn't make any sense.  I understand why OA would want to have this "pipeline", but I can't see any reason why a CO would want it.

    Even though the KC's are a Catholic organization, my church felt that it needed to have more direct control over Catholic scout units.  It ordered all KC councils to transfer their units over to the parishes.  If the bishops don't even trust the KC's to run scouting units, imagine how they feel about sending Catholic scouts to OA, which is completely outside their control.

    I can easily imagine how a CO might someday be liable because it allowed OA elections.  But even if CO's aren't financially liable for issues arising from OA elections and OA activities, they still have a moral responsibility to safeguard the children in their units.   

    Does that mean you are opposed Scouts going to high adventure bases, Jamboree's, NYLT, NAYLE, and other contingent or council based events? As staff and adult leadership is restricted by numbers, it is impossible for every CO to send adults to those type events. 

    I think you are over extending the the CO's responsibility here. 

    • Like 1
  14. On 6/14/2021 at 11:07 AM, Eagledad said:

    My problem with OA today is that the program drivers (adult sponsors) don't plan a program where the activities practice growth toward the honor of serving others and camping.

    No we don't plan programs like that. In fact, as adults, we do not plan any programs at all, other than those that Lodge Officers ask us to plan. That is usually relegated to food, and adult training tracks that run concurrently with what the youth planed. And that is about it. The Lodge Officers, Chairs and LEC plan the events. 

  15. I think it depends heavily on the individual and how they approach it. 
     

    Out of the last 30 years, I would guess almost half my time has been spent in work from home setup. 
     

    In my current job, prior to Covid, I would go into the office no more than a couple days a week. And that was only to maintain visibility with other teams. My team is spread across 3 continents (and several states here in the US), but I only have one team member here locally (an we have have the single largest campus in the organization). So the vast majority of my work was virtual even when I went to campus.

    For me, my home office is my office. I treat staying at home just like going in, same morning routine etc. My dog does snooze next to me at home, and getting a beverage or going to restroom is a shorter trip. But most things are the same now as six months ago. 
     

    In fact, I think I’m more productive, even if less social. 
     

    That said, it’s not for everyone. 

     

    • Upvote 1
  16. On a personal note, I am very bummed out. This was likely the last major event that my whole family could do together (with my children as youths). My son heads off to college in a few weeks and my daughter is upper classman in high school. We were all going to serve on staff. 

    NOAC may still be an option, depending on how things shake out. 

  17. On 7/14/2020 at 4:17 PM, carebear3895 said:

    That's......odd.

    This is pure speculation, but I think COVID-19 is being used as a scapegoat here for something else. Especially when OA's Momentum is happening in August and the Summit HA base will still be in operation. 

    Not really. The bulk of registrations come in the Spring after registration opens (in the Fall). All of the recruiting is done during Spring and Summer events; Camporees, Summer Camp etc. I am the Jambo Chair for my Council and I have talked to many families that were either waiting to see how Covid-19 shook out or were concerned about the financial impact (current and potential future) of Covid and had not yet registered. The Spring is also when we had planned to do several fundraising events for the Scouts to participate. Obviously, that did not happen.

    With Jambo costing between $1,500 and $3,000 (depending on transportation cost), losing that much fund raising time was crippling. Particularly since we are seeing increase in Covid cases, putting Summer and Fall fundraising at risk. 

    There was real concern that we could end up in a situation where would have far less than 10K Scouts at Jambo and that would be a financial disaster. 

    • Upvote 1
  18. I have never head of an age limit from National. I just checked our records and we have several that were 13 when they went through Ordeal from 1954 to 1981. One was actually 12 (Ordeal 1966). They are from at  least 6 different councils.

    The only limitation on the number of Scouts elected, that I am aware of,  was the percentage rule which was done away with in the late 1990s. And it was not a strict number that could be elected, rather a restriction that a Scout could vote for no more than HALF of the Scouts on the ballot.

  19. When I first heard "Sacred Cows" Philmont ran through my mind. It usually generates a good deal of revenue, but two of the last three Summers have been decimated by fire and Coivd. Though I think the outcry and rage would be so significant that the loss of support would outweigh any value gained. 

    My second thought was the Scouting Museum, particularly the Norman Rockwell Collection. There is a huge monetary value there and I would be far from shocked to see it end up in Sotheby's. It would be extremely sad to see it go but I doubt the rank and file would exit in protest in large numbers. 

    The fiscal assets of Northern Tier and Sea base are too small to have any real impact and they both generate revenue. The Summit is in too much debt to draw a reasonable price, but might go just to eliminate the debt. 

    Here are a few things that come to mind that could be done, some more distasteful than others

    • I don't think many people would mind seeing the national BSA structure ripped out. Turn it into a consumer cooperative like REI. Run most things via volunteers and have minimal staff. Basically turning local councils into Cooperative franchisees - 
    • Create a NFP Coop Insurance organization for CO's allowing them to purchase liability and other insurance even covering activities and facilities not related to Scouting 
    • Get rid of National Supply - have a small staff for design and compliance - outsource uniforms to 3-4 vendors and let them compete on quality and price. Same for other goods. Sell via Amazon and other platforms.
    • Open Source publications and make them completely digital with Print on Demand Options
    • Open source Scoutbook, Lodgemaster, Scoutnet (or whatever is replacing it) and all other platforms and go completely paperless for registration and management
    • Eagle Scout may become something like Religious emblems managed by a third party, like an independent NESA - setting the requirements and leveraging the marketing value through licensing fees on shirts.
    • Take the Order of the Arrow back to its roots, as a independent third party organization.
    • Place Philmont and other high Adventure Bases in independent Trust

    Im sure there a plenty more I could think of if I gave it more than a few minutes thought. But bringing Scouting back to what it used to be, volunteer based would make sense.

    • Upvote 1
  20. 13 hours ago, TAHAWK said:

    No idea.  
    But a lot of training is about achieving national objectives - not program.

    I agree that RECORDING training is a national objective, and that some of the training serves little purpose in the field. But I think training is critical. 

    When I served as Training Chair I always made sure that we covered the required check boxes, but went beyond and in more detail so our classes were really making an effort to teach the this skills needed.

    For example in IOLS we would have EMT/WFA instructors teach First Aid. We spent a lot of time understanding Orienteering (the skill we found most Scouters had difficulty with). 

    We also instructed Scouters on how to teach Scouts to be instructors, and how to leave space for Scouts to do that. We taught them to observe and how to be a guide when needed. 

    I started IOLS with a simple list

    1. You need to be proficient at the skills
    2. You need to be proficient at teaching the skills
    3. You need to be proficient at teaching Scouts to teach the skills
    4. You need to be proficient at being quiet and letting the Scout teach the skills 
    5. You need to be proficient at giving constructive ASSISTANCE ONLY WHEN NEEDED to the Scout teaching the skills
    6. Don't freak out, it is easier than it sounds
×
×
  • Create New...