Jump to content

Uniforms

For All messages dealing with Scout Uniforms


1716 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 834 views
    • 2 replies
    • 973 views
  1. Which Hat??? 1 2 3

    • 38 replies
    • 8.5k views
    • 1 reply
    • 899 views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 19 replies
    • 3.2k views
  2. Still need uniforms

    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
    • 3 replies
    • 973 views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.9k views
  3. Uniform pants

    • 1 reply
    • 840 views
  4. Scout Jackets

    • 4 replies
    • 1.1k views
  5. Powderhorn Badge

    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 740 views
    • 0 replies
    • 806 views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.2k views
  • LATEST POSTS

    • “Scouts will now have the chance to see firsthand how flexography touches their daily lives……from chips and snack bags to labels on their condiment and vitamin bottles. What better way to learn valuable skills that can lead to rewarding careers,” said Bettylyn Krafft, Executive Director of the Phoenix Challenge Foundation. Source: https://whattheythink.com/news/127424-phoenix-challenge-foundation-celebrates-scouts-americaflexo-printing-added-graphic-arts-merit-badge/
    • That is sad to hear, but not surprised.
    • September 1 update: average $581,550 per TDP claim... about the same for the last few months but continues to go up. For the TDP, 68% claims determined and 45% paid (25,954 paid) For the IRO, 44% claims determined and 21% paid (42 paid) The additional TDP claims determined, 3,851 claims, is the highest per month in quite a while.  The Trust has valued (i.e., if all of the paid claims were paid at 100% instead of 1.5%) the paid-only claims so far at $15B. If the mix remains similar through the remaining unpaid claims, the Trust would need $34B. 
    • 20 year olds cannot  serve in the district role per National. And as a 21-24 year old district committee member, I can tell you from first hand experience some Scouters viewed me as "just a kid, " 'you do not know anything because..." no knots, no beds, no SM patch, ad nauseam.   No, we are not complaining about lack of support from district committee members, we are complaining about the treatment by pros, which causes folks to not want to be involved at the district level at all. In my district's situation, the large majority of positions are vacant because no one wants to deal with the issues mentioned above.   On thing I forgot earlier Pros need to be TRUSTWORTHY, and. not lie abut why things are being done, or not being done. Best example I can give is the council being told one reason things are being done, and the unit and district volunteers a different reason why things are being done.   Do you want how it is supposed to be done, how the Pros want it done, or how it is done in reality, at least in my experience with multiple councils? The nominating committee is suppose to look at who is the best person for the job recruit them, and have the district committee vote EN BANC (emphasis) as a slate of officers. There are no choices for each position, and committee member selection can be rigged. The Pros want a nominating committee who will put people in positions so that they will do exactly what the Pros want them to do with no questioning. When I was a DE, my SE told me point blank to only select folks who can follow directions, and not necessarily the best person for each job. In reality it is whomever is willing to do the work gets the job, regardless if they are capable or not. 
    • Oregon (2016), Washington (2023?), and Minnesota (2025) also fund Outdoor School for All programs but not necessarily for the same grades.  I am curious as to the impact on Scouting membership numbers in those states.  
×
×
  • Create New...