ThenNow
Members-
Content Count
2594 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
60
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Store
Everything posted by ThenNow
-
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Bring it on… -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Question for my fellow survivor/victim claimants. What say you about this effort? As I’ve said, I hate the prospect of fraudulent claims and unethical attorneys, but have trepidation about letting the camels (Century/Chubb and Hartford) get their nose under the tent. Curious to hear your thoughts and feelings. Both matter to me. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
My important questions way back there got buried under the avalanche! PS - I’m glad I turned off email notices for every post. 😬😅😉 -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Dang it. I had my machine on text to audio while swinging in the hammock. Reminiscing about my Gramps listening to baseball on the old transistor, but this was exciting from the first pitch! -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
When do you think you will get the additional information? I’m not in any way poking, just very interested to see it, whatever ‘it’ is. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Because of BSA was going to collude with any group of lawyers, they wouldn't have picked Kosnoff D-oh. I misread your post. Apologies. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Agreed, but the statement was that the AIS secret agent accessed the POC somehow. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Why do you say that? From the launch press conference, he was clearly the lead dog. Stewart E. was a bit of a mess in terms of moderating and presentation. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
I don’t know if this happened, but I’m seriously enjoying this rabbit hole right now! I had a crap day yesterday, slept poorly, woke up early and went straight into wrangling and vexing over a matter of no eternal consequence. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
I take it no pillow was deployed? -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
How did they do that? The claimant failed to mark the POC confidential, as opposed to publicly available? Not sure how the are accessed. Never asked, since I marked mine for confidentiality. Or, the AIS person, as a Permitted Party (via what group), jumped on a pro se claimant not already represented? Dunno. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
And, he substantively responded? -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
You can direct message. Click a screen name and select it. I’m nearly a Luddite and unsure of group DMs. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Debtor in Possession. Yup. That pesky word and legal concept of agency. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
I'm glad you used the word "conflate" as opposed to anything accusatory. I'm not sure if you looked at his profile, but I highly doubt there is any malicious intent or volitional deception. My take. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
I don't care what is there to be revealed, only that it become known and widely distributed. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
That is less egregious and doesn't implicate BSA, but nonetheless very wrong on multiple levels. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
I'd say, affidavit(s) from those who experienced this firsthand. And, pronto. Sounds like they are there for the asking and a trip to the Notary. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
I'm not an insider, but yes, no, no. This was initially in 2019, if I understood correctly. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Digital redirection is, in fact, direction/indirect recommendation, if this is correct. Direct nexus: this --> then that --> then the other thing. I'll wait to see the rest. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
If any "official" website for claims registration or reporting lead to AIS contacting a would be claimant, that is the same thing, unless the system was hacked. Redirection of a contact is, effectively, a direction/recommendation. I'll wait on the pillow dealio until I see the rest of the trail. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
I have a string of expletives to unleash when I see the rest of this trail of bread crumbs, er, loaves. Going to get a pillow so my wife doesn't think I cut off some fingers or discovered my old car is missing. -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
Was the retainer agreement attached or included with any BSA presentation or materials? -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
So it's clear, AIS had it's first video briefing in Aug 7, 2019. During the conference, Stewart Einsenberg announced that a group of law firms (his firm as named at the time, Kosnoff Law, and Andrew van Arsdale/AVA Law Group) had "band together...partnered" under the banner of Abused In Scouting as early as February of 2019. This means, AIS was in existence well before the filing date one year later. What that means, of course, is they certainly COULD have been in a position to take such referrals IF they did, in fact, happen. Just want the timing to be out there and clarified. https://du -
Chapter 11 Announced - Part 5 - RSA Ruling
ThenNow replied to Eagle1993's topic in Issues & Politics
To reinforce, this is not just a request from a Scouter, but from me as a victim claimant. This is very important. Whatever you can/would share to corroborate would be helpful. I was told last night that "transparency is Scout-like." I appreciate yours already and, again, in advance.