Jump to content

InquisitiveScouter

Members
  • Posts

    2632
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    124

Posts posted by InquisitiveScouter

  1. 8 minutes ago, Troop75Eagle said:

    The people doing it apparently are do tunnel visioned and hell bent on scouring any validity of the past that there is no thought given or regarded to what the Reasonable alternatives were then, let alone the future.  

    Now you know why the term "mindless rabble" exists

    • Upvote 1
  2. 17 hours ago, Troop75Eagle said:

    Considered bugling too but I’m afraid my wife would wrap it around my neck

    My wife and kids protested at my bugling when I started...you can buy a mute that helps...nothing flashy...just a $10-15 model from Amazon.

    Go in a room, close the door, use the mute, and you will keep the peace ;)

    • Upvote 1
  3. 20 minutes ago, walk in the woods said:

    mob won't be satisfied

    Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, controls the past… The mutability of the past is the central tenet of Ingsoc. Past events, it is argued, have no objective existence, but survive only in written records and in human memories. The past is whatever the records and the memories agree upon. And since the Party is in full control of all records, and in equally full control of the minds of its members, it follows that the past is whatever the Party chooses to make it.

    Orwell, 1984

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
  4. 17 minutes ago, TAHAWK said:

    rock through the window

    Yes, it is about feeling powerless, and seeing that store as someone else's wealth/power to be destroyed.  If I cannot join you in your prosperity, I will destroy yours to even the playing field.

     

    19 minutes ago, TAHAWK said:

    Drive-by murders of fellow inhabitants

    Turf control to sell drugs...

     

    19 minutes ago, TAHAWK said:

    Hitting a 92-year-old woman in the face at random

    I think you are right here...mental illness may be the issue

    • Upvote 1
  5. 56 minutes ago, TAHAWK said:

    problem of violence with no rationalization

    All about wealth and/or power...which is why those two things always concentrate together...

    Have wealth...get power

    Have power...get wealth

    Now, there are many who use either or both for good, but that is a relatively new phenomenon in history

    • Like 1
  6. Unable to view the opinion piece...no WaPo subscription.

    Since the letter was broadcast, I have had conversations with experienced local Scouters who see the BSA's letter as (their words) "pandering", "bandwagon", "a PR stunt", "an attempt to remain relevant", "inflammatory", etc.

    Although most understand the intentions behind the letter, there is general sentiment that BSA should have simply reinforced existing parts of the program which apply.  Most also agree this will probably be the end of the DRP, or BSA risks another label of hypocrisy.

    • Upvote 1
  7. 4 minutes ago, MattR said:

    What does it take to sew canvas or typical tent fabric?

    Ask five lawyers a question and you get seven different opinions ;)

    Recommend you contact your local canvas shop (or canvas repair shop).  They can give you some good advice.  Send them that diagram and ask for a quote to make the tent.  We'd all be curious as to how much they'd ask...

    If done by hand (depending on thickness)...  recommend a thimble

     

  8. 24 minutes ago, mashmaster said:

    and attempt to judge on the individual level

    Well said, mash.

    "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

    Character is individual, not racial...  Character is what we in the BSA are supposed to be aiming at...

    And as to the police, I do question them.  I do want justice for anyone hurt or killed by the police unlawfully.  But again, individually... 

    I see too many examples, in public, of police who act as if they are above the law, rather than servants of the people under the law.

     

  9. 4 minutes ago, Navybone said:

    What Liz says is fine, and I have concern with your lack of tolerance with people who disagree with you.   

    Navybone,

    Thanks for swearing the oath and putting on the uniform.

    I never indicated the BSA was a training ground for military or police.

    My intolerance was for Liz's comment indicating military and police are "killing brown people at home and abroad."  That is a blatant, broad-brushed accusation of racism in the military and police.  I will not tolerate that kind of false accusation.

    And as you know, and should be in your experience, the military is the most egalitarian institution in our society.  Of all organizations I have been involved with in my life, the US military is the purest meritocracy I (and you?) have experienced.

    • Upvote 3
  10. @Liz

    As a 26 year veteran of the armed forces, I spent more of my career supporting humanitarian missions around the world than I did supporting combat operations under the orders of my civilian governments, which you (we) elected.

    Your comment shows an incredible level of ignorance, and is downright unscoutlike.  I recommend you delete it yourself before the moderators do.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...