Backpacker, I'm behind your comments 100%.
Every scout needs to have the opportunity to be an Eagle Scout, with the guidance and program to get there. But not every scout is an eagle scout.
Like you, Backpacker, I have seen a trend of "wishy washy" eagle projects. In our troop we have made it a habit to push for a much higher amount of man-hours completed then the troops around us, and have been told by council that our Eagle BOR are more difficult then those other troops.
But it all matters on what the goal of the troop is. Some troops focus on fun and games and scout skills others stress leadership above all else. There is no focus that is better then others, because there is no troop for everyone, and yet for each person there is a troop.
Our belief is to give our scouts the most challenging program we can, with the idea that the scouts that graduate from it will be better for it. This is done by maximizing the amount of responsibility and experience each scout gets and pushing them as far as they can go. Trips like Philmont are very helpful in this, and our vehicle for our goal is High Adventure trips as often as possible and backpacking weekends 7-8 times a year. As someone said in my other post about our Philmont training, "It's like basic training for the military." In answer to a question, why dont we have 13-14 year old eagles, with the amount of training each scout goes through in preparation for places like the Maine AT or Philmont his advancement slows but his leadership and experience grows. Also, our leadership selection is different then most troops, from what I have learned interacting with scoutmasters across the globe on web forums such as this, and really pushes scouts to step up with added responsibilities. Lastly, we are not of the mind that a 14 year old IS quite ready for eagle. He simply lacks the experience. For us.
Our system is not for everyone and thats fine, especially in our area that provides 4 troops in a small area, there is a troop that provides other needs, program and goals.